2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge-Induced Chromosome Translocation in Yeast Relies upon a Rad54/Rdh54-Dependent, Pol32-Independent Pathway

Abstract: While in mammalian cells the genetic determinism of chromosomal translocation remains unclear, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has become an ideal model system to generate ad hoc translocations and analyze their cellular and molecular outcome. A linear DNA cassette carrying a selectable marker flanked by perfect homologies to two chromosomes triggers a bridge-induced translocation (BIT) in budding yeast, with variable efficiency. A postulated two-step process to produce BIT translocants is based on the coop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the rate of aneuploidy in RDH54+ diploids (0.90 × 10 -4 ) is very similar to previous observations from diploid yeast ((5); rate 1.04 × 10 -4 ), we found that rdh54Δ elevated the rate of aneuploidy 4-fold overall and 4.5-fold within diploids ( Fig. 2; binomial test: P < 10 -4 ), indicating that RDH54 plays a role in mitotic chromosome segregation in addition to its role in meiosis (8,11), as suggested previously (12). Given the absence of aneuploidy in haploids, we cannot determine whether the increase in aneuploidy in rdh54Δ lines also applies to haploids or is unique to diploids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While the rate of aneuploidy in RDH54+ diploids (0.90 × 10 -4 ) is very similar to previous observations from diploid yeast ((5); rate 1.04 × 10 -4 ), we found that rdh54Δ elevated the rate of aneuploidy 4-fold overall and 4.5-fold within diploids ( Fig. 2; binomial test: P < 10 -4 ), indicating that RDH54 plays a role in mitotic chromosome segregation in addition to its role in meiosis (8,11), as suggested previously (12). Given the absence of aneuploidy in haploids, we cannot determine whether the increase in aneuploidy in rdh54Δ lines also applies to haploids or is unique to diploids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While the rate of aneuploidy in RDH54 + diploids (0.90 × 10 −4 ) is very similar to previous observations from diploid yeast (1.04 × 10 −4 ) (5), we found that rdh54Δ elevated the rate of aneuploidy fourfold overall and 4.5-fold within diploids ( Fig. 2; binomial test: P < 10 −4 ), indicating that RDH54 plays a role in mitotic chromosome segregation in addition to its role in meiosis (8,13), as suggested previously (14). Given the absence of aneuploidy in haploids, we cannot determine whether the increase in aneuploidy in rdh54Δ lines also applies to haploids or is unique to diploids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Since the recombination frequency between 40 bp repeats in yeast vegetative cultures was calculated as 2.9 × 10 −6 , with a 100-fold variation range, probably due to the intrinsic property of the selected sequence ( 28 ), we decided to test a set of constructs differing among them for the length of the repeat (from 40 to 800 bp) and for the length of the homologous ends (from 40 to 100 bp, see Table S1 in Supplementary Material). When the short repeat (40 bp) and the standard length of homology of a BIT cassette [65 bp ( 11 , 19 )] were used, the efficiency of the translocation NUP-TOP was very poor (0.6%) while when the repeats were extended up to 800 bp, even single site integration (SSI) events were favored against BIT [data not shown; for a detailed description of the differences between BIT and SSI pathways see Ref. ( 46 )].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constructs were all amplified by High-Fidelity PCR (Kapa Biosystems), purified and verified by sequencing (BMR sequencing service, Padova). The total amount of cells per transformation was 2.2 × 10 8 and the efficiency (E) of each transformation was determined dividing the frequency (ν) for the DNA amount in microgram used in the transformation process (ν/μg DNA) ( 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation