2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2009.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge water mediates nevirapine binding to wild type and Y181C HIV-1 reverse transcriptase—Evidence from molecular dynamics simulations and MM-PBSA calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We retained the water molecules found in the active sites of each protein for all the simulations used here as they have been shown to be critical in protein-ligand simulations in the past [19,20]. Water molecules have been shown to be important for rationalizing dynamic phenomena from MD simulations [21] as well as docking and scoring results [22,23].…”
Section: Protein Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We retained the water molecules found in the active sites of each protein for all the simulations used here as they have been shown to be critical in protein-ligand simulations in the past [19,20]. Water molecules have been shown to be important for rationalizing dynamic phenomena from MD simulations [21] as well as docking and scoring results [22,23].…”
Section: Protein Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly the relatively large size of HIV-1 RT has limited the number and scope of computational studies. Recently, studies have begun to emerge that probe NNRTI binding [28,29,30] and its impact on enzyme dynamics at the atomistic level. In particular molecular dynamics (MD) simulations by Ivetac and McCammon [29] have provided evidence to support the “arthritic thumb” hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amber f99SB force field (Case et al, 2005;Lindorff-Larsen et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 2013) parameters were used for all residues and Gaff force field (Wang et al, 2006;Wang, Wolf, Caldwell, Kollman, & Case, 2004) The polar contribution is calculated using the Poisson-Boltzmann surface area model, while the non-polar energy is estimated from the solvent accessible surface area (SASA). The conformational entropy change (-TS) was computed by normal mode analysis from a set of conformational snapshots taken from the MD simulations (Hou et al, 2011;Kollman et al, 2000;Treesuwan & Hannongbua, 2009 …”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%