2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging between economy-wide activity and household-level consumption data: Matrices for European countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly relevant for the work we present here, as this feature facilitates the link with the microdata in the Household Budget Survey, which contains expenditure patterns in the COICOP classification for products. Recent bridging matrices for all EU countries have been made available publicly for all EU countries by Cai and Vandyck (2020) . Further details on the mapping of consumption categories is presented in Supplementary Table 1.…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant for the work we present here, as this feature facilitates the link with the microdata in the Household Budget Survey, which contains expenditure patterns in the COICOP classification for products. Recent bridging matrices for all EU countries have been made available publicly for all EU countries by Cai and Vandyck (2020) . Further details on the mapping of consumption categories is presented in Supplementary Table 1.…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found that while using an official table as a prior, even if randomly selected, it outperforms recent methods such as the count-seed RAS Vandyck, 2020 andRueda-Cantuche, 2019) and significantly outperforms the naïve prior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Note: * The results of the 'Most distant' are already in the figure without Denmark (the numbers shown in brackets), and below we exclude it as a benchmark contingency table for these reasons. * * In this case the comparison is performed at the more aggregated level of the tables of Cai and Vandyck (2020), which is essentially the same as CPA, and with 35 (instead of 47) COICOP accounts. Their tables for these 8 countries are also compared to the aggregated official contingency ones.…”
Section: Similarities Across Official Contingency Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This causes difficulties in the distribution of final household demand in the productive sectors, differentiating it by age group. Therefore, it was necessary to construct a conversion matrix that related consumption groups with the sectors on the basis of the matrix created by Cai and Vandick [23] to achieve a correspondence between the household consumption groups (as classified by COICOP) and the sectors (as classified by CPA).…”
Section: Ghg Emissions By Productive Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%