Bridging employee curiosity and service creativity: a new lens

Abstract

PurposeThis study develops a framework to examine how, why and when different traits of employee curiosity affect service creativity by considering the roles of knowledge sharing and task autonomy.Design/methodology/approachTo reduce common method bias, this work separated the variables investigated into three parts, each of which was randomly used to collect data at three different periods. A total of 822 matched questionnaires obtained from frontline employees of service firms provided useable data for hypothesis tests. A moderated mediation approach was employed to analyse the data.FindingsResults are as follows: (1) Deprivation sensitivity, joyous exploration and social curiosity have positive effects on knowledge collecting (KC) and knowledge donating (KD). (2) KD mediates the relationships between the three curiosity traits and service creativity. (3) Task autonomy enhances and suppresses the mediating effects of KC and KD, respectively, on the curiosity–service creativity relationship.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has two main research implications: First, as different types (traits) of employee curiosity have different effects on service creativity, a single-dimensional view of employee curiosity may mask the differences of individual dimension and lead to a oversimplified conclusion. Second, lifting the vein from employee curiosity to service creativity has to consider the roles of knowledge sharing and task autonomy.Originality/valueThis research is the first to contribute to the service innovation literature by revealing the underlying mechanisms through which different types of employee curiosity affect service creativity and uncovering the moderating roles of task autonomy in the process mechanisms.

Self-service technology recovery: the importance of psychological need support

“…CET has attracted recent attention as a lens for understanding service phenomena. For instance, it has been used to explore the impact of rewards on behaviors and loyalty in social media settings (Rehnen et al, 2017), to understand how work environment factors influence intrinsic motivation and creativity of service workers (Coelho and Augusto, 2010), and how task autonomy moderates the acquisition and use of knowledge in a service context (Tsai and Zheng, 2021). However, our research is the first to use CET to investigate how service outcomes are influenced by the psychological need support elicited as a consequence of service recovery efforts.…”

Linking environmentally-specific empowering leadership to hotel employees' green creativity: understanding mechanisms and boundary conditions

“…ESEL and green creativity: the mediating role of green knowledge sharing behavior ESEL and green knowledge sharing behavior Knowledge sharing helps in codifying the storehouse of available knowledge in an organization and increasing it over time and is an important component of knowledge management (Lin and Chen, 2017;Liebowitz, 1999;Tsai and Zheng, 2021). Knowledge sharing is a critical organizational process because if knowledge is not shared, the intellectual resources available within an organization remain underutilized (Aboramadan et al, 2021a;Argote, 2012).…”

A sequential process from external stakeholder pressures to performance in services

“…According to the natural-resource-based view of the firm, green practices are adopted by a firm to pursue competitive advantages by the creation of environmental performance through innovation (Padilla-Lozano and Collazzo, 2022;Silva et al, 2019). The perspectives of organizational learning advocate that innovation arises from the development and utilization of new knowledge and thus requires learning (Dom ınguez-Escrig and Mall en-Broch, 2021; Tsai and Zheng, 2021). Furthermore, the innovation knowledge argues innovation as the process of organizational learning and the generation of new ideas and solutions (Sarooghi et al, 2015).…”

“…, 2019). The perspectives of organizational learning advocate that innovation arises from the development and utilization of new knowledge and thus requires learning (Domínguez-Escrig and Mallén-Broch, 2021; Tsai and Zheng, 2021). Furthermore, the innovation knowledge argues innovation as the process of organizational learning and the generation of new ideas and solutions (Sarooghi et al.…”