2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4901275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging from particle to macroscopic scales in uniaxial magnetic gels

Abstract: Connecting the different length scales of characterization is an important, but often very tedious task for soft matter systems. Here, we carry out such a procedure for the theoretical description of anisotropic uniaxial magnetic gels. The so-far undetermined material parameters in a symmetry-based macroscopic hydrodynamic-like description are determined starting from a simplified mesoscopic particle-resolved model. This mesoscopic approach considers chain-like aggregates of magnetic particles embedded in an e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a). For initialization, we arrange the particles in straight linear chain-like aggregates: each chain is one particle in diameter, but several equi-distanced particles in length that are separated by finite gaps filled with elastic material 22,49,[55][56][57] . The chains are initially aligned parallel to each other, but otherwise placed in a random non-overlapping way 53 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a). For initialization, we arrange the particles in straight linear chain-like aggregates: each chain is one particle in diameter, but several equi-distanced particles in length that are separated by finite gaps filled with elastic material 22,49,[55][56][57] . The chains are initially aligned parallel to each other, but otherwise placed in a random non-overlapping way 53 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, relative strains are introduced as a new macroscopic variable. They complement two previous hydrodynamic concepts introduced in different contexts: on the one hand relative translations, applied in the context of incommensurate smectic phases and chiral smectic polymers [30,31]; on the other hand relative rotations, introduced to characterize nematic and cholesteric liquid crystalline elastomers [32][33][34][35], the rheology of smectic liquid crystals [36][37][38], uniaxial magnetic gels [39,40], ferronematic and ferrocholesteric elastomers [41,42], and the behavior of active components in a gellike environment [43]. Relative translations and rotations have their meaning also in the present context, so we will include them into our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(76) we infer one important difference between the new macroscopic variables of relative strains and the previously introduced variables of relative translations [30,31] and relative rotations [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. In the latter cases, only the relative translations and relative rotations between the two components cost energy.…”
Section: Relative Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict the properties of macroscopic samples, it is necessary to subject our discrete model to some "homogenization". Several approaches of that kind were developed recently [13,14,15]. However, as our model takes into account only a single geometry-axially symmetrical layout of the particles with respect to the external magnetic field-in here we restrict our consideration by a very simple averaging procedure.…”
Section: Homogenizationmentioning
confidence: 99%