2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wse.2019.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging gaps between environmental flows theory and practices in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, for implementation to be effective, there needs to be processes to ensure agreements are being implemented transparently and implementers are accountable (Arthington 2012;Harwood et al 2018). Whereas political will to implement effectively can wane over time (Harwood et al 2018), well-crafted regulations can maintain accountability (Chen et al 2019). Accountability requires continual and secure funding for scientific guidance (Arthington 2012;Pahl-Wostl et al 2013;Harwood et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, for implementation to be effective, there needs to be processes to ensure agreements are being implemented transparently and implementers are accountable (Arthington 2012;Harwood et al 2018). Whereas political will to implement effectively can wane over time (Harwood et al 2018), well-crafted regulations can maintain accountability (Chen et al 2019). Accountability requires continual and secure funding for scientific guidance (Arthington 2012;Pahl-Wostl et al 2013;Harwood et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the early 1980s, there was increasing recognition of the importance of hydrological variability in sustaining ecosystem function and structure (Postel and Richter 2003). In the late 1980s to mid-1990s came recognition of the ecologically harmful impacts of hydrological alteration on water-dependent ecosystems, and the need to use e-flows to mitigate further damage (Poff et al 1997;Postel and Richter 2003;Arthington 2012;Poff and Matthews 2013;Chen et al 2019). In the late 1990s, this dynamic between hydrologic variability and ecosystem function was described by the Natural Flow Regime Paradigm, comprising five main components of flow, magnitude, frequency, duration, timing, and rate of change (Poff et al 1997).…”
Section: E-flow Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the single threshold value applied in national e-flow management, four thresholds of the four dam classes should be determined in future research. E-flow regionalization and regional e-flow threshold values have been discussed, and the results were not good [55,56]. For further e-flow research in classified dams, the threshold value for each class should be discussed.…”
Section: Multi-threshold Value Determination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies provided feedback on the best water distribution schedule to protect ecological objectives, thus providing a rational basis for the recommendations of e-flows and allocation of water resources for different stakeholders. However, the influence of temporal and spatial discrepancies in the water allocation process has received little attention thus far, which may reduce the water distribution potential, especially in arid and semiarid areas [20]. Exploring these factors could help us to provide the best solutions for managing e-flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%