Bridging key research dilemmas: Quantitative research using a critical eye

Abstract

This chapter serves as a guide for quantitative researchers who seek to approach their research questions critically. Bridging Key Research Dilemmas: Quantitative Research Using a Critical Eye Deborah Faye Carter, Sylvia HurtadoFor many of us who use quantitative methodology on a regular basis, we confront constraints while at the same time attempting to stretch the boundaries of current theory and develop models relevant to specific populations. This becomes clearer over the course of a long-term research agenda, because the topics we choose and who we are as researchers become evident through our work. In this chapter, we explore several key research dilemmas and potential solutions for quantitative researchers intent on using a critical eye for examining current theory and models.These dilemmas involve describing how the role of the quantitative researcher becomes apparent on examination of a body of work, the choice between comparing groups or highlighting variability in a single group, choosing approaches for generalizability or context specificity, and remaining "distant" or participating in action research. Finally, we propose potential solutions to some of these dilemmas, which we have confronted in our own work.In this chapter, we argue that (1) quantitative research is not wholly objective and that there are ways in which autobiography can intersect with research; (2) critical quantitative approaches identify discrepancies between theory and fact; and (3) there are positives and negatives for comparative group versus context-specific approaches to understanding group differences.

Disrupting the Pipeline: Critical Analyses of Student Pathways Through Postsecondary STEM Education

“…Within higher education, there is a growing interest in critical quantitative analysis (e.g., Baez, ; Browne, ; Carter & Hurtado, ; Kinzie, ; Stage, ). Baez () explains that this kind of analysis asks how research “can be critically transformative—that is, to what extent educational research can offer critiques of our world that allow us to transform it” (p. 18).…”

Broadening the Study of Participation in the Life Sciences: How Critical Theoretical and Mixed-Methodological Approaches Can Enhance Efforts to Broaden Participation

“…In fields and disciplines such as higher education, sociology, and gender studies, in which many scholars engage in critically transformative research, policy, and practice, there is an emergent interest in work that includes critical quantitative analysis, regardless of whether the study is entirely quantitative or it pairs qualitative and quantitative work in a critical mixed-methodological approach ( Baez, 2007 ; Browne, 2007 ; Carter and Hurtado, 2007 ; Faircloth et al ., 2015 ; Wells and Stage, 2015 ). Quantitative research and the large-scale and big data that often accompany it are frequently used to make policy and programmatic decisions.…”

Can You Really Measure That? Combining Critical Race Theory and Quantitative Methods

“…One assumption about quantitative methodology is that it is a bias-free endeavor, which contradicts tenets that take a definitive stance on the role of race and racism (Carbado & Roithmayr, 2014; D. F. Carter & Hurtado, 2007).…”