2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.yapd.2010.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging Mental Health and Medical Care in Underserved Pediatric Populations: Three Integrative Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there are few programs based within the community setting that have demonstrated improvements in outcomes for youth populations with mild to moderate mental health concerns (Asarnow et al., ; Felker et al., ). There is growing evidence that an “integrative model of care” (National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation [NICHM], ), which actively encourages primary and mental healthcare providers to work together to identify the most appropriate screening and management in appropriate settings with ongoing bidirectional and communication, is likely to be more effective (Brito et al., ). There is also evidence to support school‐based healthcare‐ and community youth‐based organizations as an effective venue for providing care for youth with a range of mental health concerns (Denny, Balhorn, Lawrence, & Cosgriff, ; Rones & Hoagwood, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there are few programs based within the community setting that have demonstrated improvements in outcomes for youth populations with mild to moderate mental health concerns (Asarnow et al., ; Felker et al., ). There is growing evidence that an “integrative model of care” (National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation [NICHM], ), which actively encourages primary and mental healthcare providers to work together to identify the most appropriate screening and management in appropriate settings with ongoing bidirectional and communication, is likely to be more effective (Brito et al., ). There is also evidence to support school‐based healthcare‐ and community youth‐based organizations as an effective venue for providing care for youth with a range of mental health concerns (Denny, Balhorn, Lawrence, & Cosgriff, ; Rones & Hoagwood, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most communities are underserved by mental health providers. Colocation of services by integrating mental health providers into the primary care medical home 30 or homeless shelters 31 improves access to mental and behavioral health care for children. For particularly disadvantaged populations, broader models of care coordination also include support for nutrition, employment, housing, and child care 32 …”
Section: Benefits Of the Medical Home For Unselected Vulnerable Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key for the integrated model relies on heavy investment of coordinated care provided by the on-site MHPs during the patient visit. 1 As Brito et al 4 describe, “Co-location does not necessarily translate into integrated care, and services may not be an improvement compared with the more traditional external consultation model. .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%