“…Boylorn and Orbe (2014, p. 19) note that a critical autoethnographic method has three aspirations: “to understand the lived experience of real people in context, to examine social conditions and uncover oppressive power arrangements, and to fuse theory and action to challenge processes of domination.” Situated in the transgressive cracks between memory and theory, I centre my lived experiences as a queer scholar-activist in this “blurred genre … refusing categorization” (Holman Jones, 2005, p. 765). Autoethnographic writing, as process and product, is a Borderland itself, and can be a political enactment of working within and through one's vulnerabilities to deepen a decolonial, social justice, queer, and feminist agenda (Chandrashekar, 2018; Chawla & Atay, 2018; Chawla & Rodriguez, 2008; Gutierrez-Perez, 2017; LeMaster et al, 2019; Padilla, 2019).…”