2023
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging Scales in Black Hole Accretion and Feedback: Magnetized Bondi Accretion in 3D GRMHD

Hyerin 혜린 Cho 조,
Ben S. Prather,
Ramesh Narayan
et al.

Abstract: Fueling and feedback couple supermassive black holes (SMBHs) to their host galaxies across many orders of magnitude in spatial and temporal scales, making this problem notoriously challenging to simulate. We use a multi-zone computational method based on the general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) code KHARMA that allows us to span 7 orders of magnitude in spatial scale, to simulate accretion onto a non-spinning SMBH from an external medium with a Bondi radius of R B ≈ 2 × 105 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not only because avoiding numerical relativity makes the computation faster, but it will allow the community to take full advantage of the numerous advances made in single black hole GRMHD codes if these are adapted for time-dependent metrics. For instance, in the past couple of decades, the GRMHD accretion community has been able to explore effects such as varying black hole spin (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al 2019;Akiyama et al 2022), varying magnetic flux supply (Tchekhovskoy et al 2011;Narayan et al 2012), varying disk tilt (McKinney et al 2013;Liska et al 2018;White et al 2019a;Chatterjee et al 2020), including radiative effects (Ryan et al 2015;White et al 2023), including nonideal physics (Ressler et al 2015;Chandra et al 2017;Foucart et al 2017;Ripperda et al 2019), and studying a variety of initial conditions informed by larger scales (Ressler et al 2020b(Ressler et al , 2021Cho et al 2023;Kaaz et al 2023;Lalakos et al 2024). Furthermore, since the user base for GRMHD is currently much larger than that for numerical relativity (e.g., Porth et al 2019), it could encourage more researchers to study binary black hole systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not only because avoiding numerical relativity makes the computation faster, but it will allow the community to take full advantage of the numerous advances made in single black hole GRMHD codes if these are adapted for time-dependent metrics. For instance, in the past couple of decades, the GRMHD accretion community has been able to explore effects such as varying black hole spin (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al 2019;Akiyama et al 2022), varying magnetic flux supply (Tchekhovskoy et al 2011;Narayan et al 2012), varying disk tilt (McKinney et al 2013;Liska et al 2018;White et al 2019a;Chatterjee et al 2020), including radiative effects (Ryan et al 2015;White et al 2023), including nonideal physics (Ressler et al 2015;Chandra et al 2017;Foucart et al 2017;Ripperda et al 2019), and studying a variety of initial conditions informed by larger scales (Ressler et al 2020b(Ressler et al , 2021Cho et al 2023;Kaaz et al 2023;Lalakos et al 2024). Furthermore, since the user base for GRMHD is currently much larger than that for numerical relativity (e.g., Porth et al 2019), it could encourage more researchers to study binary black hole systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%