2024
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202308659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging Smart Nanosystems with Clinically Relevant Models and Advanced Imaging for Precision Drug Delivery

Qiaoxia Zhou,
Qiongliang Liu,
Yan Wang
et al.

Abstract: Intracellular delivery of nano‐drug‐carriers (NDC) to specific cells, diseased regions, or solid tumors has entered the era of precision medicine that requires systematic knowledge of nano‐biological interactions from multidisciplinary perspectives. To this end, this review first provides an overview of membrane‐disruption methods such as electroporation, sonoporation, photoporation, microfluidic delivery, and microinjection with the merits of high‐throughput and enhanced efficiency for in vitro NDC delivery. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 376 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NS@lipid-PEG/CKC (0.02%) with higher positive zeta potential showed higher cellular uptake by HCECs at 4 and 6 h (Figure A). According to the literature, the positively charged nanomedicine may be electrostatically attracted by the negatively charged cell membrane, leading to increased membrane fluidity and membrane wrapping. , Furthermore, the cellular uptake of the positively charged nanomedicine is predominantly through micropinocytosis, which might also be true for NS@lipid-PEG/CKC reported here, whereas the negatively charged nanomedicine is suggested to be taken up via clathrin-/caveolae-independent endocytosis. , The specific cellular uptake mechanism of NS@lipid-PEG/CKC will be explored in future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…NS@lipid-PEG/CKC (0.02%) with higher positive zeta potential showed higher cellular uptake by HCECs at 4 and 6 h (Figure A). According to the literature, the positively charged nanomedicine may be electrostatically attracted by the negatively charged cell membrane, leading to increased membrane fluidity and membrane wrapping. , Furthermore, the cellular uptake of the positively charged nanomedicine is predominantly through micropinocytosis, which might also be true for NS@lipid-PEG/CKC reported here, whereas the negatively charged nanomedicine is suggested to be taken up via clathrin-/caveolae-independent endocytosis. , The specific cellular uptake mechanism of NS@lipid-PEG/CKC will be explored in future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, T4O has a low bioavailability due to its low solubility and stability when exposed to light, heat, moisture, and oxygen. Nanodrug delivery systems have made tremendous contributions to improve the bioavailability of drugs by their various advantageous features, including sustained and controllable drug release, cellular uptake, and protection for drug therapy at extracellular and intracellular levels. These characteristics are poised to broaden the utilization of bioactive compounds, such as plant essential oils and their derivatives, in pharmaceutical and biomedical domains. Essential oil-loaded nanodelivery systems characterized by high biodegradability and biocompatibility, such as polymer nanoparticles and liposome nanoparticles, have been researched and documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%