2023
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the Binding Sites 2.0: Photoswitchable Dualsteric Ligands for the Cannabinoid 2 Receptor

Sophie A. M. Steinmüller,
Anna Tutov,
James N. Hislop
et al.

Abstract: The cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R) has high, unexploited therapeutic potential in several central nervous system disorders due to its involvement in neuroinflammatory processes and pathologies like neurodegeneration. Dualsteric/bitopic ligands are currently developed to achieve receptor subtype selectivity and biased signaling. To obtain a molecular tool compound with photoswitchable potential dualsteric properties, we applied two different approaches to link a positive allosteric modulator with an orthosteric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key contributions include those of Decker, Leurs, Gorostiza, and coworkers (discussed in Supporting Note 2). [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] With the exception of Leurs' micromolar chemokine photoswitch ligand VUF16216, 43,48 efficacy switching on the other known targets can be considered "non-ideal" in that (a) the ligand efficacies were switched between moreand less-activating, rather than activating and inhibiting, and (b) the isomers' affinity was rather different, which compromises the concentration-independence of ideal efficacy switching. It is also certain that other efficacy switches have been created, but simply not reported as such; e.g., we also published a reagent with excellent dynamic range of bioactivity photocontrol despite its E⇆Z photoswitching incompleteness, but had not understood the full consequences of that performance at the time 34 (while re-parsing recent photopharmacology papers, we believe we have found many more instances of unsuspected efficacy switches; Supporting Note 2 discusses this further with some examples from Fuchter, Groschner, Pepperberg, Trauner, etc [52][53][54][55][56] ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key contributions include those of Decker, Leurs, Gorostiza, and coworkers (discussed in Supporting Note 2). [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] With the exception of Leurs' micromolar chemokine photoswitch ligand VUF16216, 43,48 efficacy switching on the other known targets can be considered "non-ideal" in that (a) the ligand efficacies were switched between moreand less-activating, rather than activating and inhibiting, and (b) the isomers' affinity was rather different, which compromises the concentration-independence of ideal efficacy switching. It is also certain that other efficacy switches have been created, but simply not reported as such; e.g., we also published a reagent with excellent dynamic range of bioactivity photocontrol despite its E⇆Z photoswitching incompleteness, but had not understood the full consequences of that performance at the time 34 (while re-parsing recent photopharmacology papers, we believe we have found many more instances of unsuspected efficacy switches; Supporting Note 2 discusses this further with some examples from Fuchter, Groschner, Pepperberg, Trauner, etc [52][53][54][55][56] ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%