2018
DOI: 10.1080/15289168.2018.1519755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the Divide Between Psychodynamic and Behavioral Approaches for Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the finding that psychotherapy process differed with children who also had attentional problems demonstrates what most clinicians know and do in clinical practice; children who present with comorbid ODD and ADHD often benefit from more structured approaches, even within a psychodynamic framework (Eresund, 2007). With this particular population, integrative psychotherapy approaches may be best suited to serving the complex needs of children and families (Prout, Chacko, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the finding that psychotherapy process differed with children who also had attentional problems demonstrates what most clinicians know and do in clinical practice; children who present with comorbid ODD and ADHD often benefit from more structured approaches, even within a psychodynamic framework (Eresund, 2007). With this particular population, integrative psychotherapy approaches may be best suited to serving the complex needs of children and families (Prout, Chacko, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, BPT approaches utilize explicit cognitive and behavioral techniques, thus addressing explicit emotion regulation, to manage maladaptive behavior, rather than addressing underlying disruptions in a child’s implicit emotion regulation system (Rice & Hoffman, 2014). However, current research indicates the importance of developing more adaptive implicit emotion regulation to decrease the presentation of externalizing symptoms (Hoffman, Rice, & Prout, 2016; Prout, Chacko, et al, 2018; Prout, Rice, et al, 2019). Even within cognitive–behavioral interventions for youth, the importance of emotion regulation, particularly within the context of a close relationship, has been highlighted (de Rubeis & Granic, 2012).…”
Section: Current Therapies For Odd and Other Externalizing Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of psychotherapy process prototypes demonstrated that RFP-C shares some common principles with child-centered play therapy (CCPT; Muro, Ray, Schottelkorb, Smith, & Blanco, 2006) and other psychodynamic therapy approaches for children (Prout, Goodman, Hoffman, Rice, & Sherman, 2018). Unlike these approaches, however, RFP-C is specifically designed to target the constellation of symptoms around disruptive behavior and to attend to the underlying meaning behind a child’s behavior (Prout, Chacko, et al, 2018). In RFP-C, the clinician attends to play that evokes a disruption, the emotion behind the disruption, and the nature of the play during the disruption.…”
Section: Regulation-focused Psychotherapy For Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of a dynamic approach in psychotherapy is largely documented (Midgley et al, 2009 ; Perry and Bond, 2012 ; Hilsenroth and Pitman, 2019 ; Lo Coco et al, 2019a ; Gelo et al, 2020 ; Gennaro et al, 2020 ). Process-outcome research has highlighted the effectiveness of dynamic psychotherapy in treating various mental disorder such as depression (Meystre et al, 2017 ; Starrs and Perry, 2018 ; Perry et al, 2020 ), anxiety (Maffei et al, 1995 ; Babl et al, 2019 ; Solomonov et al, 2019 ) eating disorders (Gelo et al, 2015 ; Lo Coco et al, 2021 ), pathologic addictions (Terrone et al, 2018 ; Frisone et al, 2020 ; Lo Coco et al, 2020 ; Giordano et al, 2021 ), psychotic traits (Boldrini et al, 2019 , 2020 ), externalizing problems (Prout et al, 2018a ; Hoffman and Prout, 2020 ), and personality disfunction (Lingiardi and Giovanardi, 2017 ; Goldman et al, 2018 ; Aafjes-van Doorn et al, 2019 ; Kramer, 2019 ; Di Giuseppe et al, 2020b ; Solomonov et al, 2020 ). The role of therapeutic alliance as mediator on outcomes in psychotherapy has been demonstrated in several studies highlighting the need for an in-depth investigation of patient-therapist communicative exchange (Lingiardi et al, 2010 ; Perry, 2014 ; Bhatia et al, 2017 ; Salvatore et al, 2017 ; Rocco et al, 2018 ; Tanzilli et al, 2018 ; Lo Coco et al, 2019b ; Leibovich et al, 2020 ; Zilcha-Mano et al, 2020 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%