Bridging the Gap Between Alternative Dispute Resolution and Robust Adverse Costs Orders

Ahmed, Masood

doi:10.22381/crlsj8120165

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A complete account of value-based decision (Ahmed, 2016) requires various synchronized degrees of investigation. Neuroeconomics improves the established economic proposal to shaping decision in two significant manners: (i) integrating inquiry in psychology, breaches of sound judgment are identified and admitted as pervasive (individuals often depend on preconceptions and heuristics that are furthered and influenced by previous experience); and (ii) systems neuroscience has proved that the brain operates in a corresponding, distributed way in order that input is handled synchronously by diverse specially designed systems.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?

Lăzăroiu

Pera

Ştefănescu-Mihăilă

et al. 2017

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We draw on outstanding research (Sanfey et al., 2006; McCabe, 2008; Bernheim, 2009; Camerer, 2013; Radu and McClure, 2013; Declerck and Boone, 2016) to substantiate that neuroeconomics covers the investigation of the biological microfoundations of economic cognition and economic conduct, attempts to prove that a superior grasp of how choices are made brings about superior expectations regarding which options are selected, preserves the strictness of economic analysis in defining value-based decision, and associates imaging techniques with economic pattern to explain how individuals decide on a strategy taking into account various possible choices. Neuroeconomics is adequately prepared to regulate the notion of how choices are determined by mental states. The position that will be elaborated in this article is that neuroeconomic patterns are enabled and enhanced in descriptive capacity by psychological outcomes and substantiated in biological processes. Advancement in neuroeconomics takes place when outcomes from distinct procedures are coherent with an ordinary mechanistic clarification of what generates choice, construed by a computational pattern. We will develop this point further by proving that economics improves the concerted effort of neuroeconomics by using its observations in the various results that may stem from the planned and market interplays of diverse participants, and via a series of accurate, explicit, mathematical patterns to construe such interplays and results. Neuroeconomics experiments employ a mixture of brain imaging/stimulation tests advanced in the cognitive neurosciences and microeconomic systems/game theory tests advanced in the economic sciences. Our analyses indicate that neuroeconomics aims to employ the supplementary input gained from brain investigations, associated with the decision maker’s selection, with the purpose of better grasping the cogitation process and to utilize the outcomes to enhance economic patterns.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?

Lăzăroiu

Pera

Ştefănescu-Mihăilă

et al. 2017

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Has the shift to overworked and underpaid adjunct faculty helped education outcomes?

Nica

2017

Educational Philosophy and Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital Technologies, Labor Markets, and Economic Reputation

Lăzăroiu¹,

Rommer²

2017

EMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following Gandini (2016), this paper strives to prove that knowledge work has altered with the incorporation of digital technologies into operations of production and organization. Influenced by the boost of electronic and social media, a digital and independent knowledge economy focused on a collective, dispersed cultural idea of reputation as usefulness resulted. Imagining reputation as a type of value is the predominant elucidatory pattern of knowledge work in the digital epoch. We aim to address these increasing features by elaborating on the fact that knowledge work has altered as a consequence of the visionary assessment of inventiveness as a slogan for cutting edge and professional development. We plan to determine that reputation becomes a particular type of particularized social capital for knowledge employees. We use meta-analysis to assess evidence proving that because the social buttons managing social undertakings on digital media platforms deal with and preserve an individual's full online activity, determining it with statistics, the reputation of a distinct employee is publicly observable, concrete, obtainable, and possibly quantifiable. We inspected the Web of Science and identified 240 papers covering the impact of reputation on the socioeconomic interactions in digital labor markets. We analyzed them carefully and present our conclusions, highlighting that reputation adjusts the professional market of the knowledge economy by functioning as a particular kind of capital or positive feature for people in a setting constituted of networked and recently mediatized social interplay.

show abstract

Bridging the Gap Between Alternative Dispute Resolution and Robust Adverse Costs Orders

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?

Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?

Has the shift to overworked and underpaid adjunct faculty helped education outcomes?

Digital Technologies, Labor Markets, and Economic Reputation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About