Bridging the gap between clinicians and systems biologists: from network biology to translational biomedical research

Abstract

With the wealth of data accumulated from completely sequenced genomes and other high-throughput experiments, global studies of biological systems, by simultaneously investigating multiple biological entities (e.g. genes, transcripts, proteins), has become a routine. Network representation is frequently used to capture the presence of these molecules as well as their relationship. Network biology has been widely used in molecular biology and genetics, where several network properties have been shown to be functionally important. Here, we discuss how such methodology can be useful to translational biomedical research, where scientists traditionally focus on one or a small set of genes, diseases, and drug candidates at any one time. We first give an overview of network representation frequently used in biology: what nodes and edges represent, and review its application in preclinical research to date. Using cancer as an example, we review how network biology can facilitate system-wide approaches to identify targeted small molecule inhibitors. These types of inhibitors have the potential to be more specific, resulting in high efficacy treatments with less side effects, compared to the conventional treatments such as chemotherapy. Global analysis may provide better insight into the overall picture of human diseases, as well as identify previously overlooked problems, leading to rapid advances in medicine. From the clinicians’ point of view, it is necessary to bridge the gap between theoretical network biology and practical biomedical research, in order to improve the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of the world’s major diseases.

Global temporal dynamic landscape of pathogen-mediated subversion of Arabidopsis innate immunity

“…With the availability of large-scale transcriptome and interactome data sets, the use of network-based approaches is emerging to identify structural and functional modules as well as essential and most influential nodes within a network 1 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 38 , 73 , 74 . Recently, a comparative network analysis, which combined transcriptional and PPI datasets, discovered common as well as contrasting sub-networks for biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens 75 .…”

Running a lab amidst the COVID-19 crisis: how to stay productive during lockdowns and get ready for the New Normal

“…Self-isolation and social distancing may sound like a disaster for most experimentalists, but perhaps unsurprisingly, less so for those bioinformaticians. Since bioinformatics and systems biology now have ever-increasing influences on day-to-day biological experiments and new discoveries [8,9], it is probably not a bad time to pick up some computational skills that could expedite your ongoing experiments, or even turn you into one of those bioinformaticians who can publish multiple papers each year without doing a single "experiment" (although this "accusation" is not always true). At the end of the day, what you need to get going is a computer, and the will to dive into it.…”

Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers

“…These new representations can expand our understanding of complex regulatory systems (Lavrik & Zhivotovsky 2014, Wang & Deisboeck 2014, Altrock et al 2015, Peng et al 2016, Janes et al 2017, Ji et al 2017. Ultimately, systems-based insights into the biology of endocrine-related cancers may lead to better treatments and outcomes for patients (Werner et al 2014, Jinawath et al 2016, Ji et al 2017.…”