2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gap between statistical significance and clinical relevance: A systematic review of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds of scales reported in movement disorders research

Biswamohan Mishra,
Pachipala Sudheer,
Roopa Rajan
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvements noted in the MDS-UPDRS parts I–IV and total score for several participants (regardless of group allocation) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), indicating that these participants may have experienced considerable functional gains after the program ( Mishra et al, 2024 ). Several participants were able to exceed the cutoff of 18 points on the DGI for safe ambulation, while three participants exceeded the threshold for fall risk on the FAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The improvements noted in the MDS-UPDRS parts I–IV and total score for several participants (regardless of group allocation) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), indicating that these participants may have experienced considerable functional gains after the program ( Mishra et al, 2024 ). Several participants were able to exceed the cutoff of 18 points on the DGI for safe ambulation, while three participants exceeded the threshold for fall risk on the FAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%