2018
DOI: 10.1515/icame-2018-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gap between university and upper secondary school English studies: The ULE project

Abstract: 2The ULE project 2.1 The process After initial discussions between ourselves and the upper secondary school, it was decided to only involve one teacher and one class for the pilot project. The project was set up using the open access learning management system Moodle (see https://moodle.org). This learning platform allowed us to enrol secondary school students and teachers onto the specially-designed module, where instructions, lectures, two short assignments, and feedback could be given by university teachers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It improves the learner's overall academic success, reading comprehension and opportunity to succeed in higher education (e.g., Laufer and Ravenhorst-Kalovski 2010;McMillion and Shaw 2009;Pecorari et al 2011;Yu 2009). Teachers and researchers frequently identify learners' vocabulary knowledge as in need of additional improvement, and overall, there appears to be a lack of a systematic approach by teachers in terms of vocabulary teaching (e.g., Nation 2001;Schmitt 2008;Schmitt, Jiang and Grabe 2011;Schmitt and Schmitt 2014;Walker and Allan 2018). It is within this context that this study takes place, examining how lexical input from a textbook and use of individual vocabulary notebooks affect Swedish upper secondary school students' vocabulary acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It improves the learner's overall academic success, reading comprehension and opportunity to succeed in higher education (e.g., Laufer and Ravenhorst-Kalovski 2010;McMillion and Shaw 2009;Pecorari et al 2011;Yu 2009). Teachers and researchers frequently identify learners' vocabulary knowledge as in need of additional improvement, and overall, there appears to be a lack of a systematic approach by teachers in terms of vocabulary teaching (e.g., Nation 2001;Schmitt 2008;Schmitt, Jiang and Grabe 2011;Schmitt and Schmitt 2014;Walker and Allan 2018). It is within this context that this study takes place, examining how lexical input from a textbook and use of individual vocabulary notebooks affect Swedish upper secondary school students' vocabulary acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%