The perception of motion-in-depth is important for avoiding collisions and for the control of vergence eye-movements and other motor actions. Previous psychophysical studies have suggested that sensitivity to motion-in-depth has a lower temporal processing limit than the perception of lateral motion. The present study used functional MRI-informed EEG source-imaging to study the spatiotemporal properties of the responses to lateral motion and motion-in-depth in human visual cortex. Lateral motion and motion-in-depth displays comprised stimuli whose only difference was interocular phase: monocular oscillatory motion was either inphase in the two eyes (lateral motion) or in antiphase (motion-indepth). Spectral analysis was used to break the steady-state visually evoked potentials responses down into even and odd harmonic components within five functionally defined regions of interest: V1, V4, lateral occipital complex, V3A, and hMTϩ. We also characterized the responses within two anatomically defined regions: the inferior and superior parietal cortex. Even harmonic components dominated the evoked responses and were a factor of approximately two larger for lateral motion than motion-in-depth. These responses were slower for motion-in-depth and were largely independent of absolute disparity. In each of our regions of interest, responses at odd-harmonics were relatively small, but were larger for motion-in-depth than lateral motion, especially in parietal cortex, and depended on absolute disparity. Taken together, our results suggest a plausible neural basis for reduced psychophysical sensitivity to rapid motion-in-depth. stereomotion; high-density EEG; vision; 3D WHILE TWO-DIMENSIONAL (2D) motion processing has been widely investigated in the primate brain, the neural mechanisms associated with three-dimensional (3D) motion are less well understood. Forty years ago, Beverley (1973a, 1973b) used psychophysical measures to distinguish differences between lateral motion and motion-in-depth (MID). To isolate responses specific to the type of motion, they cleverly used a stimulus that was identical monocularly, a line oscillating continuously back and forth. Either the line moved in the same direction in both eyes, i.e., in phase, producing lateral motion, or in opposite directions between the two eyes, i.e., in antiphase, producing MID. Regan and Beverley's major finding was a difference in the temporal characteristics of the two types of motion; the ability to detect oscillations in depth essentially disappeared above 5 Hz, while oscillations in lateral motion were visible up to about 20 Hz. Later psychophysical studies (Nienborg et al. 2005;Norcia and Tyler 1984) have found that disparity modulation is distinguishable from disparity noise at much higher temporal frequencies than 5 Hz, but the defining characteristics of lateral motion, coherent direction and speed, are not apparent for MID at these high frequencies.Surprisingly, the neural mechanisms responsible for the differences in the dynamics of lateral motion ...