Bridging the gap: investigating challenges and way forward for intersectoral provision of psychosocial rehabilitation in South Africa

Abstract

BackgroundIntersectoral collaboration between government sectors such as Health and Social Development and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in communities is crucial for provision of psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) for those with severe mental illness. This study aims to provide recommendations for strengthening such intersectoral collaboration in South Africa and with relevance to other low and middle income countries (LMIC), particularly African countries.MethodsTwenty-four in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 key informants from the South African Department of Health, two key informants from the Department of Social Development, four key informants from the NGO sector and one key informant from a service user organisation at national level. Framework analysis was conducted with NVivo 10 software.ResultsChallenges to intersectoral work identified were lack of communication between sectors, problems delineating roles, and each sector’s perception of lack of support from other sectors. Participant-identified strategies for addressing these challenges included improving communication between sectors, promoting leadership from all levels and formalising intersectoral relationships through appropriate written agreements; as well as ensuring that the available resources for PSR are effectively re-directed to district level.ConclusionsThis study has outlined several directions for progress to address challenges for intersectoral working for PSR in South Africa. These may be of relevance to other LMIC, particularly those in Africa. Political will and a long-term view will be necessary to realise these strategies.

‘Don’t push me aside, Doctor’: Suicide attempters talk about their support needs, service delivery and suicide prevention in South Africa

“…The importance of intersectoral collaboration for suicide prevention, particularly in LMICs, has been described (Bertolote et al, 2006; Reynolds and Conroy, 1999; Wang et al, 2008; WHO, 2012). There are a number of obstacles to achieving intersectoral collaboration in LMICs (Brooke-Sumner et al, 2016). Intersectoral approaches to the treatment of mental illnesses in SA have not been adequately achieved, especially in rural areas, because of the lack of dedicated funding for such approaches (Petersen and Lund, 2011; Thornicroft et al, 2010), failures of management and leadership to implement relevant policy (Jenkins et al, 2011) and a lack of political will (Brooke-Sumner et al, 2016).…”

Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams

“…A study focusing on South Africa showed some similar barriers and facilitators for ISC for health [39], wherein lack of communication between sectors was the main issue; each sector perceived a lack of support from the others [39]. Another barrier was that ISC is a life-long issue whereas the tenure of policy-makers is finite, posing a challenge of commitment and involvement [39]. Regionally, global policies and institutions still have too much influence on countries, sometimes overlooking country priorities, and as such hampering national ownership [40].…”

Mental health care providers’ perceptions of the barriers to suicide prevention amongst people with substance use disorders in South Africa: a qualitative study

“…Such integrated approaches have been proposed in both the National Drug Master Plan 2013–2017 [ 68 ] and the National Mental Health Policy Framework and Strategic Plan 2013–2020 [ 33 ], although evidence for this integration is absent. Research has identified a lack of communication between sectors, problems delineating roles, and perceptions of not being supported by other sectors as some of the reasons for this lack of integration and intersectoral collaboration [ 69 ]. Suggestions for improving intersectoral collaboration have been recognised more generally for mental health in SA [ 69 ] but suggestions specific to suicide prevention are currently lacking.…”