2018
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1532614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gaps: using an NHP model to predict single dose radiation absorption in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Globin-cleared RNA samples were hybridized to Agilent Whole Genome Human 4X44 v2 (catalog number: G4845A) microarrays using the manufacturer’s protocol, based on inter-species cross reactivity microarray tests between H. sapiens and Macaca mulatta [ 63 , 64 ]. Feature extraction of the images was performed using Agilent’s FE version 10.7 software and data were imported into BRB ArrayTools software version 4.6.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globin-cleared RNA samples were hybridized to Agilent Whole Genome Human 4X44 v2 (catalog number: G4845A) microarrays using the manufacturer’s protocol, based on inter-species cross reactivity microarray tests between H. sapiens and Macaca mulatta [ 63 , 64 ]. Feature extraction of the images was performed using Agilent’s FE version 10.7 software and data were imported into BRB ArrayTools software version 4.6.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point-of-care tools are needed for rapid triage to identify exposed victims shortly after an incident, while high throughput diagnostic tests are essential for dose stratification such that the appropriate medical support can be provided while taking into account logistical considerations. The utility of using radiation-responsive protein (Balog et al 2019) and gene expression signatures (Iversen et al 2019;Jacobs et al 2019) in diagnostic devices are discussed in this volume.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the near 15 years since its initiation, this Program has funded several institutions as centers of excellence, although the number of centers has declined across the intervening years from an original 8 (in which this review's senior author was a funded participant) to the current 4. This focused effort has resulted in many advances in the field as a whole, for example in animal model characterization (Williams et al 2010;Iversen et al 2018), the development of biodosimetry technologies (Brenner et al 2015;Flood et al 2016;Repin et al 2017;Jacobs et al 2018) and identification of potential biomarkers of exposure (DeBo et al 2015;Himburg et al 2016;Laiakis et al 2016;Lee et al 2018). Unfortunately, however, there does not yet appear to have been a significant breakthrough in countermeasure development per se by the Program, at least at the level of agents entering human trials.…”
Section: Current State Of Play (2013-2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%