2020
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drz056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the hybrid high-order and virtual element methods

Abstract: We present a unifying viewpoint on hybrid high-order and virtual element methods on general polytopal meshes in dimension $2$ or $3$, in terms of both formulation and analysis. We focus on a model Poisson problem. To build our bridge (i) we transcribe the (conforming) virtual element method into the hybrid high-order framework and (ii) we prove $H^m$ approximation properties for the local polynomial projector in terms of which the local virtual element discrete bilinear form is defined. This allows us to perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• recent polytopal methods such as Conforming Polygonal Finite Elements, see, e.g., Sukumar and Tabarraei (2004); Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin (HDG), see, e.g., Cockburn et al (2016), Hybrid High Order (HHO) methods, see, e.g., Cicuttin et al (2021); Cockburn et al (2016); Di Pietro and Droniou (2020); Lemaire (2021), the Weak Galerkin Method, see, e.g., Dong and Ern (2022), the Virtual Element Method (VEM), see, e.g. Beirão da Veiga et al (2013); Lemaire (2021); the Smooth Finite Element Method (SFEM), see, e.g., Liu et al (2007); Nguyen-Xuan et al (2008b); modified discontinuous Galerkin with static condensation, see, e.g., Lozinski (2019);…”
Section: Uncertainties On Coefficient Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• recent polytopal methods such as Conforming Polygonal Finite Elements, see, e.g., Sukumar and Tabarraei (2004); Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin (HDG), see, e.g., Cockburn et al (2016), Hybrid High Order (HHO) methods, see, e.g., Cicuttin et al (2021); Cockburn et al (2016); Di Pietro and Droniou (2020); Lemaire (2021), the Weak Galerkin Method, see, e.g., Dong and Ern (2022), the Virtual Element Method (VEM), see, e.g. Beirão da Veiga et al (2013); Lemaire (2021); the Smooth Finite Element Method (SFEM), see, e.g., Liu et al (2007); Nguyen-Xuan et al (2008b); modified discontinuous Galerkin with static condensation, see, e.g., Lozinski (2019);…”
Section: Uncertainties On Coefficient Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, they have undergone a vigorous development, as reflected, e.g., in the two recent monographs [9,7]. Moreover, as discussed in [8,24,5], HHO methods are closely related to hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) methods, weak Galerkin (WG) methods, nonconforming virtual element methods (ncVEM), and multiscale hybrid-mixed (MHM) methods. Interestingly, the present C 0 -conforming HHO method (C 0 -HHO in short) can be viewed as a simple approach to extend C 0 -finite element methods for biharmonic problems by simply adding an additional unknown attached to the mesh faces representing the normal derivative of the solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HHO method in the lowest-order case falls in the family of the Hybrid Mixed Mimetic [40], which includes the Hybrid Finite Volume [44], the Mixed Finite Volume [37,38] and the Mixed-Hybrid Mimetic Finite Differences [17]. In [54], the author has bridged the HHO method with the virtual element method. We refer to [12,15,16,41,53] for related works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%