2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: Experiences from conducting a mixed methods evaluation in the RUCAS programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies show ESD based on a perspective comprehending a modification of the educational paradigm of the teaching and learning process [1,8], based on a shift from classical education frameworks, to other models fostering not only knowledge transmission, but also value creation and development [5]. This educational re-orientation enhance the achievement of SD competences by the students since the learning process turns into an interdisciplinary, trans-disciplinary, problem based, and self-regulated process [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies show ESD based on a perspective comprehending a modification of the educational paradigm of the teaching and learning process [1,8], based on a shift from classical education frameworks, to other models fostering not only knowledge transmission, but also value creation and development [5]. This educational re-orientation enhance the achievement of SD competences by the students since the learning process turns into an interdisciplinary, trans-disciplinary, problem based, and self-regulated process [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observation also enables identification of the dimensions of the behavioral setting that may constrain healthy behavior and/or create risk disadvantage. Though examples of ethnographic approaches to program evaluation are sparse in the program evaluation literature, ethnographic observation complements other qualitative approaches to program evaluation; enriches mixed‐method approaches; and like “process evaluation,” helps bridge the qualitative‐quantitative divide in program evaluation by emphasizing lived context, everyday life processes, and meaning‐making (Harrits, ; Makrakis & Kostoulas‐Makrakis, ; Saunders, Evans, & Joshi, ).…”
Section: Program Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observation also enables identification of the dimensions of the behavioral setting that may constrain healthy behavior and/or create risk disadvantage. Though examples of ethnographic approaches to program evaluation are sparse in the program evaluation literature, ethnographic observation complements other qualitative approaches to program evaluation; enriches mixed-method approaches; and like "process evaluation," helps bridge the qualitative-quantitative divide in program evaluation by emphasizing lived context, everyday life processes, and meaningmaking (Harrits, 2011;Makrakis & Kostoulas-Makrakis, 2015;Saunders, Evans, & Joshi, 2005). This research is guided by an interest in uncovering the meanings and motivations that guide behavior and analyzing how these meanings are created, shared, and evaluated by participants themselves-taking into account multiple contexts of action and interaction including group, neighborhood, and community.…”
Section: Program Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the emancipatory interest focuses on "the ability of individuals and groups to take control of their own lives in autonomous and responsible ways" [22]. Grundy [22] and Makrakis and Kostoulas-Makrakis [23] continue that the emancipatory curriculum constitutes a continuous mutual relationship between self-reflection and action, including the facilitator as well as the learners (practical activity). Planning, acting and evaluating a curriculum thus become active processes of integration [22].…”
Section: Curriculum As Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%