2007
DOI: 10.1300/j079v34n02_03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the Research-Practice Gap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It enabled decision makers to participate directly in research to generate knowledge relevant to their work domains (13) and provided a relatively quick way to generate a plan among participants in different geographical locations. Because concept mapping uses a range of data collection methods (individual and group activities) and different types of analysis (quantitative and qualitative), we were able to incorporate the benefits of each form of engagement with a mixed-method approach to address a complex topic efficiently during a relatively short time (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It enabled decision makers to participate directly in research to generate knowledge relevant to their work domains (13) and provided a relatively quick way to generate a plan among participants in different geographical locations. Because concept mapping uses a range of data collection methods (individual and group activities) and different types of analysis (quantitative and qualitative), we were able to incorporate the benefits of each form of engagement with a mixed-method approach to address a complex topic efficiently during a relatively short time (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods are available for gathering and organizing data from a group of respondents (eg, Delphi technique); however, we chose concept mapping because concept maps provide a systematic way to organize and rank stakeholders’ ideas and understand how the ideas relate to each other, which is helpful in the development of a strategy (13–15). We engaged in 3 major concept-mapping activities: 1) brainstorming ideas, 2) sorting and rating ideas, and 3) analyzing and interpreting the concept maps (15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Purposes include program development (Trochim et al 2008), program evaluation (Poole and Davis 2006), instrument development (Imhof and Janusik 2006), risk assessment (Ryan et al 2005) as well as curriculum development (Cash et al 2006) research methods (Petrucci et al 2007) and policy analysis (Trochim and Cabrera 2005). The method has been used with youth (Ries et al 2008), older adults (Groenewoud et al 2008), professionals (Shewchuk et al 2005) as well as non-professionals (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, qualitative conceptual mapping techniques (Petrucci and Quinlan 2007) were used to connect the different influences and further draw out their implications for contemporary water management practices. Three workshops were conducted with a total of 21 participants, who responded to an open invitation.…”
Section: Keymentioning
confidence: 99%