2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the vocabulary gap between questions and answer sentences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the inside sentence triggering approach, the words occurring in the same sentence trigger each other while in the across sentence approach, words occurring in two consecutive sentences trigger each other. Momtazi and Klakow (2015) introduced three other triggering approaches namely, self‐triggering, question and answer pair triggering, and named entity triggering. In the self‐triggering model, each word just triggers itself and it is similar to the basic unigram model.…”
Section: Question Answer Similarity From Ir Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the inside sentence triggering approach, the words occurring in the same sentence trigger each other while in the across sentence approach, words occurring in two consecutive sentences trigger each other. Momtazi and Klakow (2015) introduced three other triggering approaches namely, self‐triggering, question and answer pair triggering, and named entity triggering. In the self‐triggering model, each word just triggers itself and it is similar to the basic unigram model.…”
Section: Question Answer Similarity From Ir Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different ways to frame the task of answering questions by machine reading, including sentence retrieval (Momtazi and Klakow, 2015), multi-hop reasoning (Khot et al, 2020), and reasoning about multiple paragraphs or documents at the same time (Dua et al, 2019;Cao et al, 2019). Recent work has considered the development of reasoning-based QA systems (Weber et al, 2019) as well as the integration of external (Banerjee and Baral, 2020) and commonsense knowledge tured knowledge graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The POS-Tagger splits each sentence into nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs in the document. From the extracted split words, the stem words and noun words are taken into account for indexing, domain grouping and categorization for faster cluster formation [11]. The keyword can be extracted using the empirical formula given below (1):…”
Section: Algorithm 1: Algorithm For Pos-tagger-based Question Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%