Background: Multiple randomized trials could not establish the non-inferiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone without preceding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or superiority of IVT followed by EVT in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. The role of prior IVT in posterior circulation LVO remains controversial. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, stroke patients with LVO in the posterior circulation who received EVT alone or with IVT were selected from the stroke thrombectomy and aneurysm registry (STAR) between 2013 to 2022. Effects of IVT followed by thrombectomy on favorable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale ? 3 at 90 days) and safety were investigated using multivariable logistic and linear regression models. Results: Of the 588 included patients, 67 % (n = 394) were treated with EVT alone and 29% (n = 170) with EVT after IVT and 4% (n = 24) have missing values on this variable. Controlling for multiple confounding factors, IVT was not associated with a higher likelihood of favorable functional outcome at 90 days (odds ratio 1.04, 95 % CI 0.52-2.09, p = 0.901). Thrombectomy alone did not show any safety advantages compared with those receiving IVT. Conclusions: Similar functional outcomes and complication rates were seen in patients with posterior circulation LVO treated with EVT alone vs EVT after IVT. Further prospective studies are required to determine the utility of IVT in posterior circulation stroke, especially in patients being directly admitted to thrombectomy centers.