Brief communication: Hair density and body mass in mammals and the evolution of human hairlessness

Abstract

Humans are unusual among mammals in appearing hairless. Several hypotheses propose explanations for this phenotype, but few data are available to test these hypotheses. To elucidate the evolutionary history of human "hairlessness," a comparative approach is needed. One previous study on primate hair density concluded that great apes have systematically less dense hair than smaller primates. While there is a negative correlation between body size and hair density, it remains unclear whether great apes have less dense hair than is expected for their body size. To revisit the scaling relationship between hair density and body size in mammals, I compiled data from the literature on 23 primates and 29 nonprimate mammals and conducted Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares regressions. Among anthropoids, there is a significant negative correlation between hair density and body mass. Chimpanzees display the largest residuals, exhibiting less dense hair than is expected for their body size. There is a negative correlation between hair density and body mass among the broader mammalian sample, although the functional significance of this scaling relationship remains to be tested. Results indicate that all primates, and chimpanzees in particular, are relatively hairless compared to other mammals. This suggests that there may have been selective pressures acting on the ancestor of humans and chimpanzees that led to an initial reduction in hair density. To further understand the evolution of human hairlessness, a systematic study of hair density and physiology in a wide range of species is necessary.

A novel method to measure hairiness in bees and other insect pollinators

“…We found that the relationship between hair density and body size was weak and negative, especially in bees. Interestingly, studies on various groups of mammals have also found that small species tend to have denser (and shorter) fur (Sandel, ; Schwartz & Rosenblum, ; Steudel, Porter, & Sher, ). We suggest that the negative relationship between hair length and hair density, rather than indicative of a direct trade‐off, can be explained through the relationship between these two variables and body size.…”

Comparative aspects of rodent and nonrodent animal models for mechanistic and translational diabetes research

“…Rodent and rabbit skin have numerous differences compared to human skin; nevertheless, rabbits are frequently used for percutaneous absorption studies (Table 2) [72]. NHP skin is closest to human skin in terms of the percutaneous absorption rate of chemical compounds, but it has higher hair follicle density [141]. Pig skin compares well with human skin in dermal architecture despite a lower number of sebaceous glands ( Table 2) [142], vascularization, and lymphatic drainage, leading to similar transdermal absorption and pharmacokinetics (reviewed in [73]).…”

The Role of Facial and Body Hair Distribution in Women’s Judgments of Men’s Sexual Attractiveness

“…While humans are the least hirsute of the anthropoid primates (Sandel, 2013), a feature that likely evolved for thermoregulation and reducing ectoparasite loads (Rantala, 2007), human skin is not glabrous. Adults may have on average 10,000-20,000 hair follicles on the face, 100,000-150,000 on the scalp, 425,000 on the trunk, 220,000 on the arms, and 370,000 on the legs (Robertson, 2002;Szabo, 1967).…”