2010
DOI: 10.1177/0145445510391242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Experimental Analysis of Sight Word Interventions: A Comparison of Acquisition and Maintenance of Detected Interventions

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine utility of a brief experimental analysis (BEA) in determining effective sight word interventions for a student with a history of difficulty with acquiring sight word recognition. Ten interventions were compared in a BEA. Following the BEA, an extended analysis was conducted that compared the two most effective interventions (from the BEA) with a control condition. Even though the BEA found two interventions to be relatively equal, one of the two interventions resulted i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of the success of this approach can be seen in the use of functional analysis of problem behavior upon which to base an intervention (Hanley et al 2003) and a similar approach being taken to determine the most effective academic instructional intervention for an individual student (e.g., Baranek et al 2011;Daly et al 1999). …”
Section: Choice Of Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of the success of this approach can be seen in the use of functional analysis of problem behavior upon which to base an intervention (Hanley et al 2003) and a similar approach being taken to determine the most effective academic instructional intervention for an individual student (e.g., Baranek et al 2011;Daly et al 1999). …”
Section: Choice Of Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of assessment would take a similar amount of time as a standardized test, but be sensitive enough to detect minor improvements in acquisition rates. The teacher can then use this information to develop an optimal intensity for intervention for that specific learner (Baranek et al 2011;Skinner et al 2002).…”
Section: Choice Of Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Brief Experimental Analysis (BEA) research have been conducted to determine the most effective intervention for improving fluency and accuracy of students' academic skills (Baranek, Fienup, & Pace, 2010;Daly, Martens, Dool, & Hintze, 1998;Daly, Martens, Hamler, Dool, & Eckert, 1999;Daly, Murdoch, Lillenstein, Webber, & Lentz, 2002;Eckert, Ardoin, Daisey, & Scarola, 2000, Eckert, Ardoin, Daly, & Martens, 2002Güler & Güzel-Özmen, 2010;Güzel-Özmen, 2011;Güzel-Özmen & Çevik, 2005;Güzel-Özmen, Karakoç, Çakmak, & Özdemir, 2009;Noel et al, 1998). Within the BEA process, intervention techniques that were identified on the basis of student performance and that improve fluency and accuracy are applied to student and then, the most effective intervention technique is selected for the student.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baranek et al (2011);Daly et al (1998);Daly et al (1999);Daly et al (2005);Daly et al (2006);Dufrene & Warzak (2007); Eckert et al(2000); Eckert et al (2002); Gortmaker et al (2007); Hofstadter-Duke & Daly (2011); McComas et al (2009); Noell, Freeland, Witt, & Gansle (2001); Schreder et al (2012); VanAuken et al . (2004); Daly et al (1998); Daly et al (2005); Daly et al (2006); Gortmaker et al (2007); Hofstadter-Duke & Daly (2011); Jones et al (2009); McComas et al (2009); Parker et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baranek et al (2011);Bonfiglio et al (2004);Burns et al (2009);Carson & Eckert (2003);Codding et al (2009);Daly et al (1998); Daly et al (1999); Daly et al (2005); Daly et al (2006); Dufrene & Warzak (2007); Eckert et al (2000); Eckert et al (2002); Gortmaker et al (2007); Hofstadter-Duke & Daly (2011); Jones et al (2009); McComas et al, (2009); Noell et al (2001); Parker et al (2012); Schreder et al (2012); Wagner et al (2003); Codding et al (2009); Eckert et al (2000); Eckert et al (2002); Parker et al (2012); Wagner et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%