2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS): Canadian contribution to the international validation project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
35
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
35
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The battery comprises the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, California Verbal Learning Test -II (first five recall trials), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test -Revised (first three recall trials). However, even though its validation is currently under development in different languages and countries, the process has been completed only in a few countries (Dusankova, Kalincik, Havrdova, & Benedict, 2012;Eshaghi et al, 2012;Giedraitienė, Kizlaitienė, & Kaubrys, 2015;Goretti et al, 2014;O'Connell, Langdon, Tubridy, Hutchinson, & McGuigan, 2015;Sandi et al, 2015;Spedo et al, 2015;Walker et al, 2016) and therefore is not yet worldwide available for use in clinical practice. Furthermore, some instruments have been recommended for the screening of CD in MS patients, namely the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT; Rao, 1991;Smith, 1982), with reported high sensitivity (.91) but poor specificity (.60) (Van Schependom et al, 2014) and good reliability in monitoring cognitive function over time (Morrow et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The battery comprises the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, California Verbal Learning Test -II (first five recall trials), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test -Revised (first three recall trials). However, even though its validation is currently under development in different languages and countries, the process has been completed only in a few countries (Dusankova, Kalincik, Havrdova, & Benedict, 2012;Eshaghi et al, 2012;Giedraitienė, Kizlaitienė, & Kaubrys, 2015;Goretti et al, 2014;O'Connell, Langdon, Tubridy, Hutchinson, & McGuigan, 2015;Sandi et al, 2015;Spedo et al, 2015;Walker et al, 2016) and therefore is not yet worldwide available for use in clinical practice. Furthermore, some instruments have been recommended for the screening of CD in MS patients, namely the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT; Rao, 1991;Smith, 1982), with reported high sensitivity (.91) but poor specificity (.60) (Van Schependom et al, 2014) and good reliability in monitoring cognitive function over time (Morrow et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers lengthen the time that mental health concerns go untreated, which is associated with a negative prognosis. 39 Validated screening tools should be adopted to better identify cognitive 9,42 and mental health concerns. 22,23 The low identification rate may be because clinicians elect not to assess concerns, as has been reported anecdotally by clinic staff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) can be administered by nonspecialized staff. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Despite this, cognitive issues are not adequately addressed, as traditional neurologic practice dominates over interdisciplinary approaches. 2,7,14 Up to 50% of people with MS experience depression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 49 It includes three tests of high reliability and sensitivity: Rao’s adaptation 10 of the SDMT, 50 the initial learning trials of the CVLT II 51 and the BVMT-R. 52 International validations are currently underway and up to now normative data exist for a number of countries. 53 57 Fortunately, as per LATAM, Spedo et al. 58 and Vanotti et al.…”
Section: Cognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%