Brief online interventions for LGBTQ young adult mental and behavioral health: A randomized controlled trial in a high-stigma, low-resource context.

Abstract

College of the Holy CrossObjective: To identify scalable interventions for improving sexual minority mental health and health-risk behavior, this study tested the efficacy of two self-guided online writing interventions-expressive writing and self-affirmation. To reach sexual minority young adults living in high-stigma, low-resource settings, we developed and tested these interventions in Appalachian Tennessee. Method: In consultation with sexual minority young adults (n ϭ 10) and stakeholders (n ϭ 10) living in Appalachian Tennessee, we adapted these two writing interventions that we then delivered to 108 local sexual minority young adults (M age ϭ 23.68, SD ϭ 3.11). Participants, representing diverse sexual and gender identities and socioeconomic backgrounds, were randomly assigned to participate in a 3-session expressive writing intervention, self-affirmation intervention, or neutral control. Participants completed mental health and health-risk behavior measures at baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. Results: Compared to the neutral control, expressive writing exerted 3-month improvements in depressive symptoms (d ϭ 0.48) and general psychological distress (d ϭ 0.36) whereas self-affirmation exerted improvement in suicidal ideation (d ϭ 0.62) and drug abuse (d ϭ 0.59). Participants who were exposed to greater contextual minority stressors common in rural regions (i.e., discrimination and victimization) experienced significantly greater 3-month reductions in depression from expressive writing and self-affirmation compared to control. Those who experienced greater discrimination also experienced significantly greater 3-month reductions in suicidality from self-affirmation compared to control. Conclusion: Brief writing interventions exert significant impact on the mental health of young adult sexual minorities, especially those exposed to minority stress. Future research can consider strategies for population-level implementation, especially in high-stigma, low-resource settings. What is the public health significance of this article?This study responds to the pressing need for efficacious interventions to improve sexual minority young adult mental and behavioral health. We find evidence that two brief online writing interven-

Country-level structural stigma, identity concealment, and day-to-day discrimination as determinants of transgender people’s life satisfaction

“…3 Multilevel mediation model of the association of country level structural stigma with life-satisfaction among transgender people across Europe mediated through transgender identity concealment and experiences of day-to-day discrimination important route to improving transgender people's wellbeing [31]. Finally, supporting personal resilience through mental health interventions could help transgender people cope with the stress of structural and interpersonal forms of stigma, in ways that support personal and community empowerment in the face of these systemic conditions [32].…”

Quality of life in the COVID-19 outbreak: influence of psychological distress, government strategies, social distancing, and emotional recovery

“…The other parameters, such as psychological distress, emotional recovery, and quality of life, are measured following Meijer, de Vries, and van Bruggen (2011) , Li and Ahlstrom (2016) , and Whoqol (1995) , respectively. Despite there are many scales to measure psychological distress, the study used the scale of Meijer et al (2011) because this measurement scale is widely used in psychology and medical research ( Baldassarri et al, 2020 ; Pachankis et al, 2020 ). Unlike the scales of Calderon et al (2020) and Mewton et al 2016 ), this scale provides robustness and complete cognitive reactions of psychological distress with the inclusion of anxiety, depression, and somatization.…”

The Role of the Rural Context in the Transition to Adulthood: A Scoping Review

“…When describing their rural sample, several studies documented high poverty rates (n = 5) or described the area as “economically depressed” (n = 3). One study described the rural area as “high-stigma, low-resource” (Pachankis et al, 2020 ). Kogan et al ( 2017 ) described their rural environment as “resource poor” with a concentration of poverty that corresponds with the worst economic and health disparities by race in the U.S. Several authors also described the rural sample as hailing from “small or midsized towns” (n = 4).…”

“…Ansari et al ( 2020 ) recommended reducing absenteeism in both rural and urban schools to prevent poor outcomes in young adulthood. Pachankis et al ( 2020 ) described the potential for a highly impactful and cost-effective brief, portable intervention that could be disseminated broadly to sexual minority young adults living in high-stigma, low-resource areas. Murry and colleagues ( 2013 , 2014 ) described how their research into risk and protective factors should be used in HIV prevention programs to address the HIV/AIDS epidemic among Black communities in the rural South.…”

“…The economic disadvantage, loss of economic opportunities specific to that geographic location, or agrarian economy and lifestyle were described as possible contributors in six studies (Beal et al, 2016 ; Crockett & Beal, 2012 ; Kefalas et al, 2011 ; Schmitt-Wilson et al, 2019 ; San Antonio & Kaplan Bucciarelli, 2020 ; Sharp et al, 2020 ). Two studies highlighted the structural challenges of residing in rural communities such as disparities in mental health providers and racial or sexual identity discrimination (Carrillo, 2016 ; Pachankis et al, 2020 ). Greene et al ( 2018 ) described the rural culture that promotes drinking and driving among young adults and Warner ( 2016 ) described a rural protective effect for low-income, Black youth who appeared to have lower marijuana use trajectories than their white peers.…”