2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief online motivational interviewing pre-treatment intervention for enhancing internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract: While the efficacy of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (iCBT) for anxiety and depression is well-established, a significant proportion of clients show little to no improvement with this approach. Given that motivational interviewing (MI) is found to enhance face-to-face treatment of anxiety, the current trial examined potential benefits of a brief online MI intervention prior to therapist-guided iCBT. Clients applying to transdiagnostic therapist-guided iCBT in routine care were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reality exists that 50% of patients had a desire for an extension and the question remains how to best address the needs of these patients. Other options to be explored in the future include focussing more on the nature of therapeutic support rather than on offering more support; for example using motivational interviewing earlier in treatment to assist with treatment engagement ( Soucy et al, 2021 ). The booster also did not improve outcomes, but nevertheless was used by patients – perhaps offering this as self-directed manner would meet potential demand for this from consumers, but not increase costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reality exists that 50% of patients had a desire for an extension and the question remains how to best address the needs of these patients. Other options to be explored in the future include focussing more on the nature of therapeutic support rather than on offering more support; for example using motivational interviewing earlier in treatment to assist with treatment engagement ( Soucy et al, 2021 ). The booster also did not improve outcomes, but nevertheless was used by patients – perhaps offering this as self-directed manner would meet potential demand for this from consumers, but not increase costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trials received ethics board approval from the University of Regina, were registered ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03304392 ; NCT03684434 ), and conducted between 2017 and 2019. Details on the design of the trials are available elsewhere ( Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2020 ; Soucy et al, 2021 ). In brief, the first trial ( Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2020 ) compared the benefits of therapists providing support once-weekly versus therapists providing support once-weekly supplemented with a one-business-day response to all client emails with no significant differences found in treatment completion or outcomes ( Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2020 ); whereas the second ( Soucy et al, 2021 ) compared the benefits of clients receiving ICBT with and without a preceding online motivational interviewing lesson and similarly found no significant group differences in treatment completion or outcomes ( Soucy et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on the design of the trials are available elsewhere ( Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2020 ; Soucy et al, 2021 ). In brief, the first trial ( Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2020 ) compared the benefits of therapists providing support once-weekly versus therapists providing support once-weekly supplemented with a one-business-day response to all client emails with no significant differences found in treatment completion or outcomes ( Hadjistavropoulos et al, 2020 ); whereas the second ( Soucy et al, 2021 ) compared the benefits of clients receiving ICBT with and without a preceding online motivational interviewing lesson and similarly found no significant group differences in treatment completion or outcomes ( Soucy et al, 2021 ). As no differences were found between experimental groups in these two trials and both trials involved the same treatment program, data was combined to maximize power in the current analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, 2 studies assessed slight variations in the same intervention [ 52 , 87 ]; however, we did not segregate these studies because they only reflected minor variations in what was essentially the same intervention. Furthermore, 3 sets of 2 studies in the sample analyzed the same interventions: [ 66 , 69 ], [ 54 , 58 ], and [ 51 , 89 ]; therefore, we grouped them together. The final list of 48 interventions is analyzed in this section and the subsequent one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%