2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0774-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Report: Additive and Subtractive Counterfactual Reasoning of Children with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract: The development of additive ('If only I had done…') and subtractive ('If only I had not done….') counterfactual reasoning was examined in children with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders (HFASD) (n = 72) and typically developing controls (n = 71), aged 6-12 years. Children were presented four stories where they could generate counterfactuals based on a given consequent (e.g., 'you left muddy footprints in the kitchen. How could that have been prevented?'). Children with HFASD increasingly used subtract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to ERP constraints, exceptions had to be presented more explicitly in the current study than in the previous one, and we believe that this may have facilitated the reasoning process. This explanation is supported by research indicating that people with ASD have trouble processing implicit information (Begeer, Terwogt, Lunenburg, & Stegge, 2009;Dennis et al, 2001). Our data suggest that when exceptions are sufficiently explicit, high-functioning adults with ASD cease to have difficulties taking exceptions into account when reasoning with conditionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Due to ERP constraints, exceptions had to be presented more explicitly in the current study than in the previous one, and we believe that this may have facilitated the reasoning process. This explanation is supported by research indicating that people with ASD have trouble processing implicit information (Begeer, Terwogt, Lunenburg, & Stegge, 2009;Dennis et al, 2001). Our data suggest that when exceptions are sufficiently explicit, high-functioning adults with ASD cease to have difficulties taking exceptions into account when reasoning with conditionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many studies of children's counterfactual reasoning have used subtractive counterfactuals, including that of Rafetseder et al (2013). However, when asked to spontaneously produce counterfactual alternatives to events, children produce up to five times more additive than subtractive counterfactuals (Begeer, Terwogt, Lunenburg, & Stegge, 2009;Guajardo & Turley-Ames, 2004;Guajardo, Parker & Turley-Ames, 2009). Guajardo et al (2009) argue that subtractive counterfactuals may place greater demands on working memory.…”
Section: The Current Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counterfactual thinking may be implicated in a range of clinical disorders, including depression (Markman & Miller, 2006) and autism (Beeger, Terwogt, Lunenburg, & Stegge, 2009). If many developments in counterfactual thinking are underpinned by different executive processes, researchers should explore subtle differences in counterfactual thinking in such disorders.…”
Section: Looking Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%