Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

Smith, Bruce W.; deCruz-Dixon, Naila; Schodt, Kaitlyn; Torres, Faerl

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_92-1

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…( 5) Neuroticism, a well-known risk factor for psychopathology, was measured with two 5-point Likert scale items, using the BFI-10 (Rammstedt & John, 2007). ( 6) Perceived stress response recovery, which is the ability to recover from stress, was measured using the 6-item Brief Resilience Scale (Smith et al, 2023). ( 7) Self-Criticism was measured using the DEQ-SC6, a validated 6item measure of self-criticism (Rudich et al, 2008).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience and Mentalizing in psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated network analysis

Zavlis,

Ebrahimi,

Puhlmann

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study examines whether resilience and mentalizing capacities affect the network constellation of various protective and risk factors among psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: A multinational sample of N = 536 psychotherapists completed surveys regarding their mentalizing capacity, general resilience, and therapist-specific resilience, as well as several other protective and risk factors. Network models of the latter factors were constructed, and global as well as local moderation analyses were conducted to examine their connectivity patterns. Results: At a global level, general and therapist-specific resilience, but not mentalizing certainty, increased absolute levels of network connectivity. At the local level, the two types of resilience specifically moderated the connections among protective factors by rendering them more positive; whereas mentalizing capacity moderated the connections between protective and risk factors by rendering them more negative. Conclusion: These findings suggest that (therapist-specific) resilience might be characterized by reinforcing links among protective factors, whereas mentalizing might be typified by weakening effects of risk factors––patterns which could prove useful for enhancing psychotherapists’ wellbeing during times of global but also personal crises.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience and Mentalizing in psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated network analysis

Zavlis,

Ebrahimi,

Puhlmann

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…采用Smith于2019年研制的SAS，共两个维度、12个条目，分别为心理弹性（条目1、3、5、7、9、11）和心理繁荣（条目2、4、6、8、10、12）［ 19 ， 25 ］。采用利克特5级评分法，非常不同意=1分，不同意=2分，中立=3分，同意=4分，非常同意=5分。总分为12~60分，其中条目2、5、7、10、11为反向计分，得分越高表示压力适应能力越好。经检验，SAS心理弹性和心理繁荣维度及总量表的克龙巴赫 α 系数分别为0.856、0.858、0.888，量表信度较好［ 19 ， 25 ］。…”

Section: 资料与方法unclassified

Development of a Chinese version of the Stress Adaption Scale and the assessment of its reliability and validity among Chinese patients with multimorbidity

FU,

WU,

ZHAO

et al. 2023

J Zhejiang Univ (Med Sci)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

目的汉化压力适应量表（SAS），并在我国多病共存患者群体中进行信效度检验。方法采用Brislin模型对SAS进行直译、综合、回译和文化调适。采用便利抽样法选取浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院、浙江普陀医院、武义县第一人民医院以及杭州市拱宸桥街道社区卫生服务中心共四家医院的323例多病共存患者为检验对象进行调查，对量表进行项目分析［临界比值法、题总相关法和等级反应模型（项目特征曲线和条目区分度）］、信度分析（克龙巴赫 α 系数和折半信度）、内容效度分析（专家评分法）、结构效度分析（验证性因子分析法）及效标关联效度分析（Pearson相关系数法）。结果修订后的中文版SAS量表包含心理弹性和心理繁荣两个维度，共10个条目。项目分析中，临界比值法示所有条目临界比值均大于3.0（均 P <0.001）；题总相关法示Pearson相关系数均大于0.4（ P <0.01）；等级反应模型示修订后的量表项目特征曲线明显且条目区分度均大于1.0。信度分析中，中文版SAS的克龙巴赫 α 系数为0.849，折半信度为0.873，内在一致性较好。效度分析中，专家评分法示各条目及量表内容效度指数均大于0.80；验证性因子分析中，修订后两维度模型的适配度指标卡方自由度比（ χ 2 /df）、近似误差均方根（ RMSEA ）、均方根残差（ RMR ）、拟合优度指数（ GFI ）、调整拟合优度指数（ AGFI ）、比较拟合指数（ CFI ）、非规范拟合指数（ TLI ）分别为3.115、0.081、0.046、0.937、0.898、0.936、0.915，模型拟合达标；效标关联效度中，中文版SAS得分与压力感知量表、治疗负担量表得分呈负相关（ r =－0.592、－0.482，均 P <0.01）。结论中文版SAS量表信效度良好，可用于评估我国多病共存患者的压力适应能力，为个体化健康管理措施的制订提供参考。

show abstract

“…The instrument reflects the toughness of the patient while dealing with his illness. This instrument consists of six question items, using a Likert scale with an assessment score of 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) (Norvang et al, 2022;Smith, 2008). All items in the BRS start with and revolve around 'self' or belief in one's ability to bounce back (such as the question item: "I tend to get back on my feet quickly after hard times") (Ye e al., 2022).…”

Section: Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience after stroke and its correlation with functional independence

Heltty,

Zahalim

2023

J. Ners

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Resilience involves the ability to adapt to the conditions of disability experienced by post-stroke patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the resilience of post-stroke patients and determine the relationship with the patient's functional ability. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional study that included 122 post-stroke patient respondents who had undergone a stroke recovery phase for 5 - 8 weeks. Selection of the sample used simple random sampling method. Univariate analysis was used to describe the characteristics of each respondent. Bivariate analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between resilience and functional abilities of respondents, especially functional abilities related to activities of daily living. Results: The results of this study found that there was a significant relationship between resilience and functional ability of the respondents (p = 0.000; 95% CI). Conclusions: Respondents with a high level of resilience can make better use of their abilities so that they can increase their functional independence abilities. Thus, it can achieve a better quality of life improvement.

show abstract

Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

Cited by 6 publications

References 47 publications

Resilience and Mentalizing in psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated network analysis

Resilience and Mentalizing in psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated network analysis

Development of a Chinese version of the Stress Adaption Scale and the assessment of its reliability and validity among Chinese patients with multimorbidity

Resilience after stroke and its correlation with functional independence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About