Brief Resilience Scale in Front Children’s Behavior Problems

Cantero-García, María; Alonso‐Tapia, Jesús

doi:10.1037/t73105-000

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the CFA, a bivariate model was confirmed for items positively and negatively formulated with a higher order factor, which indicates the homogeneity of the scale, similar to the analyses carried out for their language versions [ 33 , 59 , 63 ], confirming this type of homogeneity of the scale. This type of model with two factors, first order, for positively and negatively formulated positions is very well fitted to the data.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 73%

“…assessment of depression or perceived stress). A closer definition of the ability of an individual to "bounce back" from negative experiences related to family or relational problems, health problems, or problems in the workplace increases when we deal with different social contexts and the specifics of family life [26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background We conducted three studies to validate the Polish version of the BRS. Our objectives are as follows: first, to explore the dimensional structure of the scale and to determine the internal consistency (study 1: n = 1022); second, to determine the congruent and divergent validity of the BRS (study 2: n = 242); and third, to examine sensitivity of the BRS scale to detect high-risk population (study 3: n = 602). Methods To explore the dimensional structure of the scale, we tested a two-factor model with one factor for positively worded items and one factor for negatively worded items. To determine the congruent and divergent validity of the BRS, we analysed correlations among BRS and resilience, positive mental health, and with positive and negative religious coping. We used Student’s t-test to examine sensitivity of the BRS scale to detect a high-risk population. Results Based on the CFA, a bivariate model was confirmed for items positively and negatively formulated with a higher order factor, which indicates the homogeneity of the scale, similar to the analyses carried out for their language versions confirming this type of homogeneity of the scale. The internal compatibility assessment based on Cronbach’s Alpha and McDonald’s Omega is good (0.88). Our analyses intended to test convergent and divergent validity, and showed that the BRS results are significantly related to a questionnaire measuring similar constructions. Our validation studies also provided important diagnoses regarding BRS "sensitivity", indicating that groups with higher stress levels achieved lower BRS resilience results. Conclusion The results of our research indicate that the Polish version of the BRS should be considered to be a reliable and valid research tool. The Polish version of BRS is a reliable and accurate way of measuring resilience as the ability to bounce back from adversity and overcome various challenges or stressors. This scale may be used for both research and intervention purposes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 73%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Resilience can be measured by its three categories and, therefore, the development of validated measures with good reliability indices in both intrapersonal and personal factors are necessary to be able to respond to these categories. There are several resilience scales for different populations, such as the Spanish Resilience Questionnaire [23], and other scales for different areas, for example, for the family, the Inventory of Resilience for mothers [24] and the Brief Scale of Resilience to Children's Behavior Problems, addressing evaluation of resilience of parents [25].…”

Section: Evaluating Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Resilience Scale for Adolescents in High School in a Spanish Population

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resilience is a personal competence that facilitates coping with adversity and forms part of an individual’s psychosocial adjustment. Therefore, this construct has an important role in adolescent development. Youths with high levels of resilience usually show less risk of behavioral disorders, low academic performance or interpersonal conflicts. The objective of this study was to validate the Resilience Scale for Adolescents (READ) in a Spanish population, and test whether this questionnaire is valid for different cultures and societies. The sample comprised 317 high school students aged 13 to 18 years old with an average age of 14.93, in the province of Almería (Spain). The Resilience Scale for Adolescents was administered for this. Based on exploratory factor analysis and the various previous studies undertaken on validation of this instrument, four models were proposed, of which the original READ model showed the best fit. Validation of this scale showed good internal consistency and high reliability on five factors: Family Cohesion, Personal Competence, Social Competence, Social Resources and Orientation toward Goals. It is considered a valid instrument for evaluating the various factors of resilience and can help determine the education factors contributing to the process of positive adaptation in adolescence.

show abstract

Brief Resilience Scale in Front Children’s Behavior Problems

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

Validation of the Resilience Scale for Adolescents in High School in a Spanish Population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About