Brief Strategic Family Therapy: Engaging Drug Using/Problem Behavior Adolescents and Their Families in Treatment

Szapocznik, José; Zarate, Monica; Duff, Johnathan H.; Muir, Joan A.

doi:10.1080/19371918.2013.774666

Cited by 14 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, physicians can enlist active caregiver collaboration in supporting treatment enrollment, offering not only to provide a program referral but also to facilitate the initial contact between the family and SU treatment providers. Strength-based strategies such as these are consistent with established family-based treatment engagement procedures for ASU and associated problems (e.g., Alexander, Waldron, Robbins, & Neeb, 2013; Liddle, 2002; Szapocznik, Zarate, Duff, & Muir, 2013). Likewise, these physician-caregiver adaptations to RT are consistent with empirically validated family-based clinical procedures that mobilize caregiver support to influence highly resistant adolescents to enroll in SU treatment (Kirby et al, 2015; Waldron, Kern-Jones, Turner, Petersen, & Ozechowski, 2007).…”

Section: Referral To Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 67%

SBIRT-A: Adapting SBIRT to Maximize Developmental Fit for Adolescents in Primary Care

Ozechowski

Becker

Hogue

2016

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) model is widely recommended as part of routine visits in pediatric primary care despite a dearth of evidence on its effectiveness, feasibility, and developmental appropriateness for adolescents in this setting. The purpose of this article is to explicate ways that SBIRT may be tailored to better serve adolescents in primary care under a set of recommended adaptations that we refer to collectively as SBIRT-A or Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Adolescents. Each component of the SBIRT-A framework incorporates recommendations to optimize developmental fit with adolescents based on extant empirical research, developmental theory, and well-documented barriers to service delivery in primary care. Commonalities across proposed adaptations include reliance upon proactive methods to identify and engage youth; innovation in service delivery aimed at improving the consistency and reach of interventions; and a family-focused approach to engagement, assessment, and intervention. Specific recommendations include taking advantage of every clinical encounter with the family to screen, involving caregivers in assessments and brief interventions, leveraging technology to administer brief interventions and booster sessions, and patient- and family-centered procedures for treatment referral and engagement. The adaptations proposed in this article have the potential to enhance the detection of adolescents with SU problems in primary care, the consistency of intervention provision, and engagement of this typically recalcitrant population into appropriate treatment.

show abstract

Section: Referral To Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 67%

SBIRT-A: Adapting SBIRT to Maximize Developmental Fit for Adolescents in Primary Care

Ozechowski

Becker

Hogue

2016

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, the level of attrition (or participant dropout) is also of concern in intervention studies. Szapocznik et al (2013) state that having families engaged throughout the treatment process enhances participation and so positive outcomes for those undergoing treatment. Thompson, Bender, Windsor, and Flynn (2009) found that having participants' homes as a setting for the intervention increased participation and engagement.…”

Section: Engaging the Familymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many studies merely used case examples to illustrate their interventions (Bickerton, Hense, Benstock, Ward, & Wallace, 2007;Dausch & Saliman, 2009;Lepage, 2005;Marvel et al, 2009;Philipp, 2012;Smith & Handler, 2009;Szapocznik, Zarate, Duff, & Muir, 2013;Williamson et al, 2014). Therefore, the level of attrition (or participant dropout) is also of concern in intervention studies.…”

Section: Engaging the Familymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the RE‐AIM framework to identify and describe best practice models in family‐based intervention development: A systematic review

Isaacs

Roman

Savahl

et al. 2017

Child & Family Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The family unit carries with it a responsibility of possibly being the most important predictor of positive child development. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and describe best practice models or processes in family-based intervention development. The following databases were included in the review: PsychArticles, Academic Search Complete, ERIC, SocIndex, Sage, Sabinet, and Pubmed. Peer-reviewed, English language, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods in nature conducted within the last 10 years. Interventions were required to include families as part of the programme as well as describe the model or process used in intervention development. Two self-developed data extraction tables were developed for this review. The articles included for review were heterogeneous in terms of the outcomes, and so a narrative synthesis was used. After yielding an initial search of 400 studies, 28 articles were finally included for extraction and analysis with varying levels of intervention strength. Interventions are further described in terms of reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance dimensions. A feasible intervention appears to be one that is flexible, engages processes to recruit those who are most at-risk and is facilitated by someone known to or from the same community as the participants, can retain its participants, and can be evaluated with the same participants at a minimum of 6 months later.

show abstract

“…Many studies and reports document adverse effects of substance use disorders (SUDs) on the family system and individual members, including children [1–8]. These disorders clearly affect many people in addition to the individual with the problem, often creating a burden for the family and its members.…”

Section: Effects Of Substance Use Disorders On the Familymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Outreach efforts may be needed to engage families in treatment. A number of effective interventions have been used with families to increase their rates of involvement with the family member with the SUD in treatment [8, 9, 22]. …”

Section: Interventions For Social or Family Problemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family and social aspects of substance use disorders and treatment

Daley¹

2013

Journal of Food and Drug Analysis

168

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are associated with numerous medical, psychiatric, psychological, spiritual, economic, social, family, and legal problems, creating a significant burden for affected individuals, their families, and society. This paper focuses on the effects of SUDs on family and social problems and emphasizes the need for clients in treatment to address these domains in their ongoing recovery. Individual, group, and family interventions to address these issues for clients with SUDs and their families are reviewed.

show abstract

Brief Strategic Family Therapy: Engaging Drug Using/Problem Behavior Adolescents and Their Families in Treatment

Cited by 14 publications

References 31 publications

SBIRT-A: Adapting SBIRT to Maximize Developmental Fit for Adolescents in Primary Care

SBIRT-A: Adapting SBIRT to Maximize Developmental Fit for Adolescents in Primary Care

Using the RE‐AIM framework to identify and describe best practice models in family‐based intervention development: A systematic review

Family and social aspects of substance use disorders and treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About