2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bright-field TEM imaging of single molecules: Dream or near future?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 In addition to the concept of "critical dose" previously considered in the literature, our approach attributes configurational 094110-5 = 0.14 nm, as described in the text. Under the 200 keV e-beam, the signal-to-noise ratio is close to the critical value of 5 during the whole transformation process due to the large values of cross sections for a damage event.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 In addition to the concept of "critical dose" previously considered in the literature, our approach attributes configurational 094110-5 = 0.14 nm, as described in the text. Under the 200 keV e-beam, the signal-to-noise ratio is close to the critical value of 5 during the whole transformation process due to the large values of cross sections for a damage event.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside the context of the living cell there is already a burgeoning interest in studies of single biomolecules which have been realized in various ways including, for example, the use of spectroscopic, X-ray, and neutron scattering and scanning probe and electron microscopy techniques. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In particular, recent advances in functionalizing nanoparticles with complex macromolecules 19,20 provide completely new opportunities of single molecule tagging and tracing. The most significant previous research in this area has focused on bioconjugates between DNA and gold nanoparticles, prepared using well-established gold-thiol chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This arises from the fact that intensities of sharp peaks in diffraction pattern need to be detected rather than weak fringes arising from phase contrast in images. The transfer of phase contrast in HRTEM is very inefficient with respect to dose (Malac, Beleggia, Egerton, & Zhu, ) and with scintillator‐CCD detectors the signal may be comparable to noise. In comparison the corresponding diffraction peaks can be located easily because the strong diffraction peaks suffer less from readout noise of the CCD than HRTEM images (Malac et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%