2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bright Single-Layer Perovskite Host–Ionic Guest Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells

Abstract: Perovskite light-emitting devices have drawn considerable attention for their favorable optoelectronic properties. High carrier mobilities make perovskites excellent candidates as host materials in electroluminescent devices, but perovskites have yet to be brought to their full potential in this role. To achieve high performance in a simple single-layer device, we employed a CsPbBr3 perovskite host and a novel ionic iridium complex guest along with a polyelectrolyte to demonstrate efficient light-emitting elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigated CsPbBr 3− x Cl x PeLECs by voltage sweeping and constant current, as shown in Figure . We present the 10th voltage sweep data, as they exhibited 20% to 50% better performance than data from the first sweep, likely from greater EDL formation due to slow ion relaxation [ 7a,11 ] and reduced trap density from electrical stress. [ 12 ] (See Tables S3 and S4, Supporting Information, for the comparison.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigated CsPbBr 3− x Cl x PeLECs by voltage sweeping and constant current, as shown in Figure . We present the 10th voltage sweep data, as they exhibited 20% to 50% better performance than data from the first sweep, likely from greater EDL formation due to slow ion relaxation [ 7a,11 ] and reduced trap density from electrical stress. [ 12 ] (See Tables S3 and S4, Supporting Information, for the comparison.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same context, we note with interest that it is common to include a relatively thin (typically ≈20–40 nm) spin‐coated layer of PEDOT:PSS in between the ITO anode and the active material in conventional closed‐electrode‐LECs. [ 67–69 ] The motivation for the inclusion of this “intermediate layer” in LEC devices has, to our knowledge, not been systematically studied, but the herein presented results imply that a similar transfer of anions into the PEDOT:PSS layer could be expected, albeit at lower relative magnitude (since the PEDOT:PSS layer is thinner than the active material). This in turn suggests that the PEDOT:PSS layer becomes additionally p‐type doped, and that the p‐n junction as a consequence is shifted away from the reflective Al cathode towards the anode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is experimentally observed, as complexes with larger molar absorptivities (ε o ) approach an independence of the initial rate of Sn(0) deposition on [Ir­(III)] at lower concentrations of photocatalyst, exemplified by a plot of α against ε o of all 22 Ir­(III) photocatalysts (Figure A). Increasing absorptivity can be achieved by either lowering the HOMO–LUMO gap through synthetic tuning or using highly conjugated C^N or N^N ligands. , For example, despite the opposite electronics of the C^N ligand of Ir5 (electron rich, with a tert -butyl substituted phenyl ring, Figure ) and Ir8 (electron poor, with a −CF 3 substituted phenyl ring, Figure ), their respective molar absorptivities at 440 nm are very similar (Table ), attributed to the highly conjugated bathophenanthroline ancillary ligand. This is a particularly useful characteristic, as it allows photocatalysts to possess both potent excited state reduction potentials and large molar absorptivity in the visible region.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%