2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brinell-Hardness data (HBW 2.5/62.5) of aluminum alloy EN AW-2618A after different aging times and temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where P b = 100 kgf is the load on the indenting tool, D s = 1.59 mm is the diameter of the steel ball, and d I = 1.19 mm is the measured diameter at the rim of indentation. This value fell into the range of 50-140, as measured by Rockenhäuser [14] and Ali [28]. Compared with H 5 4 , the percentage difference was −3.37%.…”
Section: Hardness Estimation and Brinell Testmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where P b = 100 kgf is the load on the indenting tool, D s = 1.59 mm is the diameter of the steel ball, and d I = 1.19 mm is the measured diameter at the rim of indentation. This value fell into the range of 50-140, as measured by Rockenhäuser [14] and Ali [28]. Compared with H 5 4 , the percentage difference was −3.37%.…”
Section: Hardness Estimation and Brinell Testmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…is the measured diameter at the rim of indentation. This value fell into the range of 50-140, as measured by Rockenhäuser [14] and Ali [28]. Compared with 5 4 H , the percentage difference was −3.37%.…”
Section: Hardness Estimation and Brinell Testmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation