2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing complexity into clinical practice: An internistic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the vast majority of patients (86%) had to consult at least two different specialist physicians before a definitive diagnosis was made. An excessive fragmentation of care may contribute per se to diagnostic delay and to poorer patient management, as was hypothesised in other settings . Haematologists made a correct diagnosis with a median diagnostic delay of 1 month, compared to a median of 6 months for gastroenterologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In our study, the vast majority of patients (86%) had to consult at least two different specialist physicians before a definitive diagnosis was made. An excessive fragmentation of care may contribute per se to diagnostic delay and to poorer patient management, as was hypothesised in other settings . Haematologists made a correct diagnosis with a median diagnostic delay of 1 month, compared to a median of 6 months for gastroenterologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Building further on the important foundation of CGA and frailty, adding a dynamical dimension through resilience measurements may offer a way forward in personalizing the prediction and management of recovery . Quantitative tools to dynamically measure resilience can complement CGA‐based clinical intuitions and hence boost clinical resilience management .…”
Section: Added Value Of the Resilience Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Building further on the important foundation of CGA and frailty, adding a dynamical dimension through resilience measurements may offer a way forward in personalizing the prediction and management of recovery. 19 Quantitative tools to dynamically measure resilience can complement CGA-based clinical intuitions and hence boost clinical resilience management. 4,9 In this review, two crucial leads for developing such tools and expanding our capacity to manage the resilience of individual patients are advocated: first, performing multiple repeated measurements around a stressor can provide insight about the patient's dynamic responses to stressors; and, second, linking psychological and physiological subsystems can provide insight into dynamic interactions involved in a resilient response.…”
Section: Added Value Of the Resilience Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidity is one of the major factors contributing to patients' complexity, leading to a more difficult therapeutic approach, especially when it is associated with frailty. Physicians often have to face with multimorbid patients and this could be due to the spreading of unhealthy lifestyle and to the longer life expectancy (81). Moreover, comorbidity worsens the prognosis of IBD per se, increasing the likelihood of drug-to-drug interaction.…”
Section: Comorbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%