2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing genetics and biochemistry to crop modelling, and vice versa

Abstract: The rationale to link crop modelling with genetics and biochemistry (the MGB framework) is presented;-Examples showing the synergy among the three disciplines are highlighted;-Experiences of practising this MGB framework so far are summarised;-The MGB framework best serves as a first step towards "Crop Systems Biology".

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crop model-based improved simulation techniques with response to environmental conditions have been developed for making effective and proper use of input resources [23]. Simulation models define the systematic processes related to crop growth and development and are useful tools to assess the impact of soil extrinsic factors (fertilization), variability of climatic conditions, and crop management practices [24,25] by providing credible predictions [26]. Typically, crop models consider the time span in which a specific growth stage takes place and initiate biomass of crop components, e.g., roots, leaves, stems, and yield attributes, as they change time to time, and similarly, changes in the nutrients content and soil moisture status.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop model-based improved simulation techniques with response to environmental conditions have been developed for making effective and proper use of input resources [23]. Simulation models define the systematic processes related to crop growth and development and are useful tools to assess the impact of soil extrinsic factors (fertilization), variability of climatic conditions, and crop management practices [24,25] by providing credible predictions [26]. Typically, crop models consider the time span in which a specific growth stage takes place and initiate biomass of crop components, e.g., roots, leaves, stems, and yield attributes, as they change time to time, and similarly, changes in the nutrients content and soil moisture status.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sunflower crop, while low-throughput phenotyping enabled the link between crop physiology and modeling, we showed in this study that the automation allowed us to use functional genomics tool to better study the genetic basis of complex traits (Yin et al, 2018). While other phenotyping platforms are focused on this goal, such as the PHENOARCH platform (Cabrera-Bosquet et al, 2016) recently used by Chen et al (2018) to estimate genotype-specific radiation use efficiency in complex canopies through reverse modeling; platforms operating in outdoor conditions are not frequent (Araus et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Combining the results with crop models will improve the output to levels 4 and 5 (quantitative knowledge) with the inclusion of other data types such as solar radiation, crop water and nutrient use efficiency, etc. Such quantitative modelling efforts can be carried out with either experimental data from known crop genotypes/varieties or landraces [43] or with simulations of suitability for accessions collected in similar pedoclimatic conditions using globally available datasets [37,44]. Finally putting all of these insights together in open access software tools can help with rapid delineation of alternative cropping options.…”
Section: Combining With Traditional Land System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%