2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11280-007-0033-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing Semantics to Web Services with OWL-S

Abstract: Current industry standards for describing Web Services focus on ensuring interoperability across diverse platforms, but do not provide a good foundation for automating the use of Web Services. Representational techniques being developed for the Semantic Web can be used to augment these standards. The resulting Web Service specifications enable the development of software programs that can interpret descriptions World Wide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
219
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 445 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
219
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The networked system model builds upon semantic technologies and especially semantic web services ontologies [17]. Fig.…”
Section: Ontology-based Networked System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The networked system model builds upon semantic technologies and especially semantic web services ontologies [17]. Fig.…”
Section: Ontology-based Networked System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent years have seen numerous Semantic Web Service frameworks being proposed and promoted for standardisation through W3C member submissions. The most prominent ones are OWL-S [6], WSMO [7], and the WSDL-S [8] specification that evolved into the W3C Recommendation of SAWSDL [9].…”
Section: Describing Service Characteristics In Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we however discuss only related works that build on the established Semantic Web Service frameworks of OWL-S [6], WSMO [7], and WSDL-S [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic Web services standards (e.g., WSDL, BPEL) generally ignore data semantics, rendering semantic interoperability far from reality. Several initiatives, e.g., OWL-S (Martin et al 2007), WSMF/WSMO (Lausen et al 2005) and METEOR-S (Patil et al 2004), have proposed languages and frameworks to explicitly add semantics into service descriptions. Despite the foundations provided by these efforts, effective methods still need to be developed for reconciling data misinterpretation in Web services composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%