Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
To ascertain reserves and future development of low permeability formations drilled with oil-base mud (OBM) in a highly deviated offshore well, low contamination hydrocarbon samples were required. With limited sampling time allowed, due to historical stuck-tools cases within the same environment, different sampling technologies were appraised. Focused sampling was selected based on detailed near wellbore formation simulation. The sampling technique was successfully deployed, with a single tool string descent, in a complex 3D 6" slim wellbore (S-profile with 51 degrees inclination followed by a tangent, then a J-profile followed by another tangent). Different sampling techniques were attempted earlier to sample in the low permeability formation using various single probe sizes and inflatables, but none were successful to prove hydrocarbons, mainly due to the allowable sampling window, and tool sticking indicators that prevented longer cleanup duration. A rigorous pre-job near wellbore simulation modeling was performed to envisage varied scenarios and be prepared for contingencies. Sensitivities were run for thickness, kv/kh, sampling depth and permeability. Consequently, elongated focused probe sampling technique and straddle packer were selected. The inflatable straddle packer was kept as a contingency. Focused sampling has undergone dramatic changes over time by combining different probe sizes / types. This type of sampling technology uses the outer flow produced at a guard inlet to prevent mud filtrate from migrating into the sample inlet. Three sampling points were selected based on the pressure data. Despite the long tool string and harsh environment, samples were successfully collected. When compared to the previously drilled well within the same reservoirs, this is considered as a major achievement to secure samples which eventually proved oil and secured a license. Cleanup time varied between 2.0 hours and 3.5 hours, with 96 to 142 liters pumped volume. The inflatable straddle packer was not used. This saved more than 12 hours of rig time and secured risk-free samples with a smooth operation. Laboratory Analysis of the hydrocarbon collected samples indicated OBM filtrate contamination ranges between 3.0% and 5.0%. Pre-job near wellbore simulation proved to be a powerful tool to study sensitivities and extremes at sand face, which helped deploy the optimal sampling solution in a time constrained and mechanically challenging scenario. The post-job near wellbore simulation helped to fine tune some of the reservoir parameters such as thickness, which would be helpful for future applications. This was the first deployment of extended range probe focused sampling (elongated focused probe sampling) in the low permeability reservoirs in Malaysia and Petronas, and the same was successful. The risk of using inflatables in slim hole was avoided. The high-quality sampling was achieved in one tool string descent, allowing timely well completion and met the first oil timeline.
To ascertain reserves and future development of low permeability formations drilled with oil-base mud (OBM) in a highly deviated offshore well, low contamination hydrocarbon samples were required. With limited sampling time allowed, due to historical stuck-tools cases within the same environment, different sampling technologies were appraised. Focused sampling was selected based on detailed near wellbore formation simulation. The sampling technique was successfully deployed, with a single tool string descent, in a complex 3D 6" slim wellbore (S-profile with 51 degrees inclination followed by a tangent, then a J-profile followed by another tangent). Different sampling techniques were attempted earlier to sample in the low permeability formation using various single probe sizes and inflatables, but none were successful to prove hydrocarbons, mainly due to the allowable sampling window, and tool sticking indicators that prevented longer cleanup duration. A rigorous pre-job near wellbore simulation modeling was performed to envisage varied scenarios and be prepared for contingencies. Sensitivities were run for thickness, kv/kh, sampling depth and permeability. Consequently, elongated focused probe sampling technique and straddle packer were selected. The inflatable straddle packer was kept as a contingency. Focused sampling has undergone dramatic changes over time by combining different probe sizes / types. This type of sampling technology uses the outer flow produced at a guard inlet to prevent mud filtrate from migrating into the sample inlet. Three sampling points were selected based on the pressure data. Despite the long tool string and harsh environment, samples were successfully collected. When compared to the previously drilled well within the same reservoirs, this is considered as a major achievement to secure samples which eventually proved oil and secured a license. Cleanup time varied between 2.0 hours and 3.5 hours, with 96 to 142 liters pumped volume. The inflatable straddle packer was not used. This saved more than 12 hours of rig time and secured risk-free samples with a smooth operation. Laboratory Analysis of the hydrocarbon collected samples indicated OBM filtrate contamination ranges between 3.0% and 5.0%. Pre-job near wellbore simulation proved to be a powerful tool to study sensitivities and extremes at sand face, which helped deploy the optimal sampling solution in a time constrained and mechanically challenging scenario. The post-job near wellbore simulation helped to fine tune some of the reservoir parameters such as thickness, which would be helpful for future applications. This was the first deployment of extended range probe focused sampling (elongated focused probe sampling) in the low permeability reservoirs in Malaysia and Petronas, and the same was successful. The risk of using inflatables in slim hole was avoided. The high-quality sampling was achieved in one tool string descent, allowing timely well completion and met the first oil timeline.
A brown field, offshore Sarawak, Malaysia, with multiple sub-layered laminated sands of varied pressure regimes and mobility ranges, was challenged by depletion, low mobility and uncertainty in the current fluid types and contacts. Optimal dynamic fluid characterization and testing techniques comprising both Wireline and Logging While Drilling (LWD) were applied in nine development wells to acquire reliable formation pressure data and collect representative fluid samples including fluid scanning. Some of the latest technologies were deployed during the dual crises of falling oil price and the Covid-19 pandemic. The S-profile wells were drilled using oil-base mud (OBM) with an average deviation of 60 degrees. Formation Pressure While Drilling (FPWD), Fluid Sampling While Drilling (FSWD) and wireline formation testing, and sampling were all utilized allowing appropriate assessment of zones of interest. Various probe types such as Conventional Circular, Reinforced Circular, Elongated, Extra-Elongated and Extended Range Focused were used successfully, ensuring that the right technology was deployed for the right job. Formation pressure and fluid samples were secured in a timely manner to minimize reservoir damage and optimize rig time without jeopardizing the data quality. As a classified crisis due to the pandemic, rather than delaying the operations, a Remote Operations Monitoring and Control Center was set-up in town to aid the limited crew at rig site. A high success rate was achieved in acquiring the latest formation pressure regimes, fluid gradients, scanning and sampling, allowing the best completion strategy to be implemented. With the selection of the appropriate probe type at individual sands, 336 pressure tests were conducted, 44 fluid gradients were established, 27 fluid identification (fluid-id / scanning) pump-outs were performed, and 20 representative formation fluid samples (oil, gas, water) were collected. Amongst the Layer-III, Layer-II and Layer-I sands, Layer-I was tight, with mobility < 1.0 mD/cP. Wireline focused probe sampling provided clean oil samples with 1.4 to-3.7 wt. % OBM filtrate contamination. The water samples collected from Layer-II during FSWD proved to be formation water and not injection water. The wells were thus completed as oil producers. Reliable fluid typing and PVT quality sampling at discrete depths saved rig time and eliminated the requirement of additional runs or services including Drill Stem Testing (DST). This case study has many firsts. It is the first time where latest fluid characterization and testing technologies in both Wireline and LWD were deployed for an alliance project in Malaysia and that too during dual crises of falling oil price and the pandemic aftermath. Overcoming various challenges including limited rig site manpower, there was no delay in completing the highly deviated wells with tight formations in a single drilling campaign and provided rig time savings. For the purpose of this case study, two wells have been discussed. First well used the wireline focused sampling technology and the second used the FSWD technology.
Thinly laminated and silty deep-water reservoirs of offshore Malaysia have historically posed difficulties in formation evaluation due to complex log responses causing uncertainties in key petrophysical properties like porosity, water saturation, net pay and productivity. Moreover, compartmentalization of the reservoirs due to extensive faulting in this area increases the evaluation challenges. Generally, thinly laminated reservoirs are evaluated either by high-resolution methods, including borehole imaging and whole core analysis; or bulk volumetric approaches, which utilize nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and suitable shaly sand saturation equations. Adding silt as an additional component requires a cautious combination of these two approaches. Furthermore, linking the petrophysical evaluation with depositional processes and structural settings using borehole image, acoustic log and formation pressure is key to the future development of the field. Lastly, securing clean formation fluid samples is crucial to design the production strategy. Aforesaid complete dataset was acquired in a deep-water well of offshore Malaysia to assess hydrocarbon potential. While relatively higher resistivity distinguished potential hydrocarbon bearing zones, NMR-based irreducible water saturation was a crucial indicator of possible water-free hydrocarbon production from the silty zones with high water content. Net sand was accurately calculated from the high-resolution borehole image and compared with the standard petrophysical approach. Then, a detail analysis of formation dip, facies and paleo-current direction was performed on borehole image to recognize different depositional processes and structural settings. Formation pressure data was collected extensively to understand reservoir compartmentalization. While the testing zones were selected based on higher free fluid and higher resistivity anisotropy; the precise testing depths on sand laminae were guided by high-resolution borehole image. Later, low contamination downhole fluid samples were collected using focused sampling technique. 2D NMR method and real-time downhole analysis of optical absorbance, refractive indices, fluorescence, density, viscosity and sound speed were used to differentiate formation fluid from the OBM filtrate. The reservoirs were then evaluated integrating the petrophysical properties with the depositional process and structural settings to understand their long-term production potential. This paper represented a case study of an integrated workflow of optimum data acquisition and evaluation of the thinly laminated sand-silt-clay sequence of deep-water reservoirs of offshore Malaysia. Effective and optimum integration of NMR, high-resolution borehole images, formation testing and sampling data provides the robust framework of this formation evaluation workflow to solve the complex petrophysical and geological uncertainties of these reservoirs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.