2018
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing the Real World Into Developmental Science: A Commentary on Weber, Fernald, and Diop (2017)

Abstract: This article examines the parent intervention program evaluated by Weber et al. (2017) and argues that there are scientific and ethical problems with such intervention efforts in applied developmental science. Scientifically, these programs rely on data from a small and narrow sample of the world's population; assume the existence of fixed developmental pathways; and pit scientific knowledge against indigenous knowledge. The authors question the critical role of talk as solely providing the rich cognitive stim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that most of the families in the current study were of relatively high SES, and future studies should aim to include families across the socioeconomic stratum. There is a growing understanding that developmental pathways (like the link between adult talk and child language skills) are culturally specific rather than universal for all infants [Morelli et al, ], so the findings of the current study may not apply to non‐Western cultures. It is also important to recognize that adult speech is only one way in which parent communication supports child development [Sperry, Sperry, & Miller, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It should be noted that most of the families in the current study were of relatively high SES, and future studies should aim to include families across the socioeconomic stratum. There is a growing understanding that developmental pathways (like the link between adult talk and child language skills) are culturally specific rather than universal for all infants [Morelli et al, ], so the findings of the current study may not apply to non‐Western cultures. It is also important to recognize that adult speech is only one way in which parent communication supports child development [Sperry, Sperry, & Miller, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These abilities are very different from those fostered by dyadic, turn-taking, and sequential engagements (Chaudhary, 2012;Gratier, 2003;Keller, Otto, Lamm, Yovsi, & K€ artner, 2008). These very different social contexts are likely to have implications for the nature of children's attachment relationships (Keller & Bard, 2017) as well as for developmental trajectories in general (Keller & K€ artner, 2013).…”
Section: Taking Turns or Not?: The Structure Of Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it seems that their understanding of this care is constrained by assumptions about normative care practices common in Western lifestyles. They view multiple care through the lens of (multiple) dyadic exchanges (for further discussion, see Morelli, Bard, et al., ). This focus ignores the multiparty interactions prevalent in many cultural communities as the normative social environment of infants, which may be different from multiple instances of dyadic interactions.…”
Section: Linking Sensitive Responsivity To Its Cultures Of Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less well recognized, however is the “cultural misfit” between the standard ECD curriculum, which is largely imported from the United States and other Western countries, and the cultural backgrounds of the families who send their children to preschool. A few observers have highlighted this issue, suggesting that a refocusing of curricula on local expectations may yield valuable results (Morelli et al., 2018; Ng'asike, 2014; Serpell & Nsamenang, 2014). The issue is not only the expected age for particular accomplishments, but also more profoundly the selection of behaviors of most interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%