Bringing the ugly back: A dialogic exploration of ethics in leadership through an ethno-narrative re-reading of the Enron case

Abstract

TITLEBringing the ugly back: a dialogic exploration of ethics in leadership through an ethno-narrative rereading of the Enron case AUTHORS Edwards, G; Hawkins, B; Schedlitzki, D AbstractIn this paper we adopt a dialogic approach to examining narratives on ethics in leadership. We do this through an ethno-narrative re-reading of writing on the Enron case informed by Bakhtin's ideas on dialogue. Employing concepts such as beautyism, aesthetic craving and recent writing around disgust and abjection in organisations helps us to develop a deeper relational interpretation of written accounts of leadership and ethics in organisations.We identify two underlying and interrelated social tensions exemplified in existing narratives on this popular example of 'unethical' leadership practice. Both tensions, we conclude, are linked to denigrating the ugly in favour of the beautiful and we have labelled them 'suppressing the ugly' and a fetish for 'looking good'. We go on to suggest that these two tensions then combine in the stories about this case to ultimately beautify a toxic masculinised persona. We suggest therefore that our dialogic perspective on ethical leadership narratives helps to uncover how accounts about Enron are developed through an intricate interplay between seeking to 'look good' and the suppression of moral judgment by leaders of the organisation.

Do United States accountants' personal values match the profession's values (ethics code)?

“…The ethical failures of leading CPAs in connection with financial scandals, such as Enron, AA, WorldCom and Madoff provide examples of the ongoing problem that the CPA profession has with unethical acts by practitioners in both public and industry practices; an ethics problem that is posited in this work as related to personal value priorities. Enron is particularly relevant to the study of ethics in accounting, as it has been regarded as a seminal event and the subject of numerous studies (cf., Edwards et al , 2018; Carnegie and Napier, 2010; Smith et al , 2005; Sims and Brinkmann, 2003; Smith, 2003), its “creative accounting” (Jones, 2011; Gherai and Balaciu, 2011), its impact on legislation (Rockness and Rockness, 2005) and remains a subject for concern (Ashe and Nealy, 2010).…”

Problematizing leadership learning facilitation through a trickster archetype: An investigation into power and identity in liminal spaces

“…Finally, our trickster lens also calls attention to the romanticization of leadership development facilitation (Smolović Jones et al, 2014), similar to the romanticization of leadership generally (see Collinson et al, 2018, for a recent review). We suggest that romanticized notions of the facilitator role could hide more trickster-ish, 'ugly' (Edwards et al, 2019), uncomfortable and, in the extreme, unethical practices. Hence, drawing out the trickster in our explorations enables us to provide an built-in ruptural critique (Collinson et al, 2018) of leadership developmentakin to how that a famous tricksterthe court jestermight challenge the authority of a monarch.…”

Theorizing dramaturgical resistance leadership from the leadership campaigns of Jeremy Corbyn

“…Following an initial discussion of impressions gleaned, the authorinterviewer used the material to construct a 14,000-word meta-narrative. Acknowledging that familiarity might hinder fresh interpretation, the three authors embarked on an abductive and iterative editing and re-working of the document (Edwards et al, 2018;Iszatt-White, Kempster and Carroll, 2017), shifting between the meta-narrative, leadership theory and data not yet drawn on, seeking gaps and unexplained phenomena. Here, the more distant perspectives of the other two authors were valuable.…”