2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4912560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing together manual and automated code assessment

Abstract: This paper presents an effort to incorporate assessment of manually assessed aspects in an automated code assessment process. Fully automated code assessment has its drawbacks which makes manual assessment of some aspects of student solutions a necessity. In most situations during the assessment of code written by students the most appropriate approach would thus be splitting the process in two phases -automatic plus manual. This might result in two completely distinct procedures for each of the phases. The so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if they contribute a lot in helping both instructors and learners, future developments should probably be focused on approaches combining automated and human grading. In [124], automated and manual assessments have been fully integrated, manual interventions being required all along the automatic grading. Such an approach that is not limited to the usual sequential one with a clear split between automatic and manual phases should maybe be explored more in the future.…”
Section: Human Intervention and Assessment Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if they contribute a lot in helping both instructors and learners, future developments should probably be focused on approaches combining automated and human grading. In [124], automated and manual assessments have been fully integrated, manual interventions being required all along the automatic grading. Such an approach that is not limited to the usual sequential one with a clear split between automatic and manual phases should maybe be explored more in the future.…”
Section: Human Intervention and Assessment Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated assessment systems are very helpful in reducing the amount of repetitive work done by instructors on programming courses with a lot of practical exercises and feedbacks (Pribela et al, 2012). Assessing and providing feedback on computer programs is time consuming, because there are many fundamental aspects relating to good programming that need to be considered (Ala-Mutka, 2005).…”
Section: Calms Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Testovid system provides hints and advices into the student testing reports, enabling graders to give learners comprehensible feedback about their programming solutions (Pribela et al, 2007). Testovid is the testing system implemented by using Apache Ant that allows students to test their assignments in a systematic manner (Pribela et al, 2012). The system allows instructor to run the same tests on a set of student assignments.…”
Section: Testovid Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation