Bringing Value-Based Perspectives to Care: Including Patient and Family Members in Decision-Making Processes

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence shows that patient engagement is an important strategy in achieving a high performing healthcare system. While there is considerable evidence of implementation initiatives in direct care context, there is limited investigation of implementation initiatives in decision-making context as it relates to program planning, service delivery and developing policies. Research has also shown a gap in consistent application of system-level strategies that can effectively translate organizational policies around patient and family engagement into practice. Methods: The broad objective of this initiative was to develop a system-level implementation strategy to include patient and family advisors (PFAs) at decision-making points in primary healthcare (PHC) based on wellestablished evidence and literature. In this opportunity sponsored by the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement (CFHI) a co-design methodology, also well-established was applied in identifying and developing a suitable implementation strategy to engage PFAs as members of quality teams in PHC. Diabetes management centres (DMCs) was selected as the pilot site to develop the strategy. Key steps in the process included review of evidence, review of the current state in PHC through engagement of key stakeholders and a co-design approach. Results: The project team included a diverse representation of members from the PHC system including patient advisors, DMC team members, system leads, providers, Public Engagement team members and CFHI improvement coaches. Key outcomes of this 18-month long initiative included development of a working definition of patient and family engagement, development of a Patient and Family Engagement Resource Guide and evaluation of the resource guide. Conclusion: This novel initiative provided us an opportunity to develop a supportive system-wide implementation plan and a strategy to include PFAs in decision-making processes in PHC. The well-established co-design methodology further allowed us to include value-based (customer driven quality and experience of care) perspectives of several important stakeholders including patient advisors. The next step will be to implement the strategy within DMCs, spread the strategy PHC, both locally and provincially with a focus on sustainability.

Recruitment of caregivers into health services research: lessons from a user-centred design study

“…UCD is a ‘co-design’ or ‘participatory design’ [14–19] process that focuses on partnering with end-users and designing with family caregivers not for them [20, 21]. Co-design, a mainstream term in health services research, refers to shared leadership and partnership between designers and end-users [22]. Co-design participants are assumed to hold different values, perspectives, and interests with final products emerging from shared visions, co-learning, and mutual understanding [23].…”

The Newcomer Health Clinic in Nova Scotia: A Beacon Clinic to Support the Health Needs of the Refugee Population

“…Another example is the creation of a quality team that includes patients and family advisors from the clinic as equal partners in program planning and decision-makers. 20…”

Supporting and Engaging Families: An Examination of Publicly-Funded Health Promotion Programs in the Intermountain West, USA

“…The inclusion of family science principles such as human development and family system theories in public health training could help health promotion practitioners better understand and use the family as a partner in change (22). Other weaknesses that exist in current health promotion programming may stem from a lack of knowledge, training, and understanding about family impact principles and their ability to guide program planning and evaluation (23,24).…”