Suez 1956 1991
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198202417.003.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Britain and the Crisis, 1955–1956

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What Dulles had planned as a possible step towards peace, Eden presented as something akin to a declaration of war. 29 Dulles' SCUA proposal, and particularly the aggressive version presented by Eden, stirred up strong reactions around the globe. In Norway, the proposal was regarded as an unnecessary provocation towards Egypt.…”
Section: A Firm Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…What Dulles had planned as a possible step towards peace, Eden presented as something akin to a declaration of war. 29 Dulles' SCUA proposal, and particularly the aggressive version presented by Eden, stirred up strong reactions around the globe. In Norway, the proposal was regarded as an unnecessary provocation towards Egypt.…”
Section: A Firm Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One week later, AngloFrench forces landed on Egyptian soil. 46 Throughout the world, news of these actions was received with shock. The Norwegians were at a loss to understand, let alone explain, the behaviour of Britain and France.…”
Section: Norway and A Major International Crisis 225mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 Eden subsequently stressed that "it would be hard to imagine a statement more likely to cause the maximum allied disunity and disarray". 38 In a similar vein, Eden's press secretary, William Clark, complained: "Dulles pulled the rug from under us and watered down the Canal Association till it was meaningless". 39 "The nub of the thing", recalled US Ambassador in London, Winthrop Aldrich, "was that Eden thought this organization [SCUA] was being formed for the purpose of laying a basis for intervention by force".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They went blindly ahead and ... have been suffering one of the most severe diplomatic defeats Britain has taken in many years". 71 Although Eden's successors avoided a Suez-style breach with the Americans, they still showed a propensity to act in the Middle East without full backing from Washington. The decision of the new Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, to send British troops to Jordan to stabilize the Kingdom following the July 1958 revolution in neighbouring Iraq was far from welcome in Washington and received, at best, grudging support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%