1954
DOI: 10.1680/ipeds.1954.11638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

British Highway Bridge Loading.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These limit states were analysed for combinations of dead and traffic loading; the traffic load models considered were normal (HA) and abnormal (HB), in accordance with BD 21 Highways Agency, 2001), the assessment loading code. Normal (HA) loading is said to represent the worst-case occurrence of typical traffic loading over the lifetime of the bridge, and is specified by a standard loading curve derived from the bunching of trucks in a notional 5 lane (Henderson, 1954). This is most onerous for shorter spans as this bunching can more reasonably be expected to occur, and is less onerous for longer spans where such an occurrence is less likely.…”
Section: Description Of Network and Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limit states were analysed for combinations of dead and traffic loading; the traffic load models considered were normal (HA) and abnormal (HB), in accordance with BD 21 Highways Agency, 2001), the assessment loading code. Normal (HA) loading is said to represent the worst-case occurrence of typical traffic loading over the lifetime of the bridge, and is specified by a standard loading curve derived from the bunching of trucks in a notional 5 lane (Henderson, 1954). This is most onerous for shorter spans as this bunching can more reasonably be expected to occur, and is less onerous for longer spans where such an occurrence is less likely.…”
Section: Description Of Network and Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a long-standing shortage of congested traffic data, mainly due to current limitations of detection techniques. This is reflected in the fact that most existing long-span bridge traffic load models are based on conservative assumptions, such as a queue of vehicles at minimum bumper-to-bumper distances [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], thus neglecting driver behaviour. However, trafficrelated technologies are developing rapidly, thus enabling a better understanding of driver behaviour and overall traffic features, particularly during congestion.…”
Section: Research On Highway Bridge Traffic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pioneering studies focussed on wors-case scenarios [5,6], a probabilistic approach to bridge loading is now common [7-11, 27, 33, 38, 60, 62-66]. The probability F that a load level z is not exceeded (probability of non-exceedance) is commonly expressed in terms of return period, T(z) [67].…”
Section: Statistics Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the latter 19th century, traffic loading on bridges was not of primary concern to the bridge builder, as this load was considered light relative to the self-weight of the structure itself (Henderson 1954). It was only subsequent to the emergence of the traction engine that the effect of traffic loading on bridges became an important design criteria.…”
Section: Evolution Of Normative Traffic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%