2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brittle fracture of U-notched graphite plates under mixed mode loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
106
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better investigate the notch sensitivity of isostatic graphite, considering different failure modes, a large experimental program has been conducted by Berto et al (2012aBerto et al ( , 2012bBerto et al ( , 2013 and Lazzarin et al (2013). The fracture tests were carried out on a commercial isostatic polycrystalline graphite.…”
Section: Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In order to better investigate the notch sensitivity of isostatic graphite, considering different failure modes, a large experimental program has been conducted by Berto et al (2012aBerto et al ( , 2012bBerto et al ( , 2013 and Lazzarin et al (2013). The fracture tests were carried out on a commercial isostatic polycrystalline graphite.…”
Section: Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These points were also highlighted by Greenstreet (1968) and Greenstreet et al (1969). Berto et al (2012aBerto et al ( , 2012bBerto et al ( , 2013 and Lazzarin et al (2013) in their experimental work, used a single value for elastic modulus obtained through a load-displacement graphs. The deviation of the tested specimens from linear behavior at failure was less than 0.02%.…”
Section: Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, because EMC acts as a bridge between the linear elastic and elastic-plastic analyses, it is expected that it can basically be linked to various brittle fracture criteria, e.g. the maximum tangential stress (MTS) and mean stress (MS) (Ayatollahi & Torabi, 2010a, 2010bTorabi, 2013d;Ayatollahi et al, 2011aAyatollahi et al, , 2011bAliha & Ayatollahi 2013;Mirsayar et al 2014;Torabi et al, , 2014dTorabi & Amininejad, 2015aTorabi & Pirhadi 2015;Torabi & Abedinasab, 2015a criteria, the averaged strain energy density (ASED) criterion (Lazzarin & Zambardi, 2001;Berto & Lazzarin, 2014;Torabi et al, , 2015cBerto & Barati, 2011;Gomez et al, 2007Gomez et al, , 2009aGomez et al, , 2009bBerto et al, 2007Berto et al, , 2012Berto & Ayatollahi, 2011;Berto & Lazzarin, 2009;Aliha et al 2016), the cohesive zone model (CZM) (Gomez et al, 2000(Gomez et al, , 2006Gomez & Elices, 2003;Cendon 42 et al, 2015) and the finite fracture mechanics (FFM) (Sapora et al, 2013(Sapora et al, , 2015Cornetti et al, 2012Cornetti et al, , 2014Weißgraeber & Becker, 2013;Carpinteri et al, 2008) etc. under different in-plane loading conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%