Broad Insecurity and Perceived Victimization Risk

Abstract

Appealing to fear of crime and perceived risk of victimization is a known political strategy for gaining popular support. While fear of crime and perceived risk may stem from vulnerability and past experiences of victimization, high levels of fear and perceived risk, despite declining crime rates, had prompted researchers to investigate other sources of fear of crime and perceived victimization risk. We used survey data from 1,200 households in Metro Manila to test the hypothesis that perceived risk of victimization may be predicted by broad insecurity, which encompasses insecurities in finances, employment, education, health, disaster preparedness and rights protection. Multivariate regression is used to measure variable effects. Our results showed that broad insecurity significantly influences perceived risk of victimization. Other reliable predictors included past victimization, local government spending and social identifiers such as age and gender, but none was as strong as broad insecurity. These findings suggest that perceptions of public safety depend not only on tough policing, but also economic opportunities, human capital development and overall wellbeing. This article corroborates budding research on the diffuse sources of fear of crime and victimization. It informs political and economic prioritization in pursuit of social harmony and development amidst a rapidly changing socioeconomic and political landscape. JEL: Z13, Z18

The effect of socioeconomic factors, fear of crime and social mobilization on the evaluation of judiciary decisions

“…Past experience is a predictor of FOC (Bachman et al, 2011;Caliso et al, 2020;Hicks & Brown, 2013;Jalain et al, 2020;Riggs & Cook, 2015;Sironi & Bonazzi, 2016), but the vicarious experience provided by TV and social media must also be considered. Events such as kidnappings or child death covered extensively in the media, for example, might have an immediate negative impact, which may be long-lasting (Prieto Curiel & Bishop, 2016).…”

Satisfaction with the Police: Perceptions and Related Variables from an Urban Community Sample

“…Urbanisation may be a sign of improvements in quality of life of community (Nunes et al 2017), despite not always being available to an entire population of a certain limited area. It also potentiates social inequalities through exclusion processes (Hope and Karstedt 2003) and many urban spaces become unsafe, as physical structures and the new social dynamics (Sani and Nunes 2013a) interfere with behavioural patterns (e.g., through the limitation of mobility, a decrease in social interaction with the community, and the adoption of strategies of self-protection) (Caliso et al 2019). Such changes may deeply impact people's lives, well-being, and overall quality of life (Makita et al 2020).…”