2022
DOI: 10.1109/lmwc.2022.3177897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband Contactless 90° Waveguide Transition With a U-Shaped Choke Groove

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering fabrication and assembly errors, conventional subtractive manufacturing faces challenges in maintaining good electrical contact due to mandatory split‐block fabrication. Consequently, contactless designs for ridge transitions have been proposed, 12,13 where electromagnetic fields are partially transmitted through gaps instead of along joint metal. In Reference 12, a contactless coplanar waveguide (CPW) to WG transition is proposed and indicates measured results of RL and IL better than 10 dB and 1.9 dB in 38% bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering fabrication and assembly errors, conventional subtractive manufacturing faces challenges in maintaining good electrical contact due to mandatory split‐block fabrication. Consequently, contactless designs for ridge transitions have been proposed, 12,13 where electromagnetic fields are partially transmitted through gaps instead of along joint metal. In Reference 12, a contactless coplanar waveguide (CPW) to WG transition is proposed and indicates measured results of RL and IL better than 10 dB and 1.9 dB in 38% bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference 12, a contactless coplanar waveguide (CPW) to WG transition is proposed and indicates measured results of RL and IL better than 10 dB and 1.9 dB in 38% bandwidth. In Reference 13, a 90° WG transition with U‐shaped choke groove is designed and fabricated. And the measurement shows that in 170–260 GHz, the RL is better than 10 dB while IL is better than 0.2 dB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%